|
|
|
kita mcintosh
{K:18594} 5/21/2003
|
fantastic glossy sheen!
|
|
|
|
|
Kaj Nielsen
{K:15279} 4/24/2003
|
Excellent compoced, beautiful light and coloring. Regards Kaj Nielsen
|
|
|
|
|
amanda guthrie
{K:93} 4/23/2003
|
great Photo Ross, and I don't know if you'll get to the other thread where I answered your question, no Mcon35 just a 7+ close up lens.
for the Starling, you caught the sheen on his back so nicely, great colours. Now a Question from me, the Tcon 300, how do you fare carring the beast around it looks like it weighs as much as one of my children LOL. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Massimo Ghini
{K:2311} 4/23/2003
|
Very good capture.Well exposed.
|
|
|
|
|
Don Gangemi
{K:22} 4/22/2003
|
This European starling (coast to coast in lower 48) is one of my least favorite birds, but it is a very good photograph.
|
|
|
|
|
Ross Mckinnon
{K:1172} 4/22/2003
|
Answers to your questions:-
Leslie Cohelan, it's the TCON300 (420mm equiv).
Andrew Kochanowski, yes it's me i'm afraid :))
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Costa - Lucaz
{K:9205} 4/22/2003
|
Very nice work, regards!
|
|
|
|
|
Deleted User
{K:881} 4/22/2003
|
Ross, you wouldn't happen to be that infamous fellow from England, would you? Not your usual style, this, is it? LOL
|
|
|
|
Nando Mondino
{K:14261} 4/22/2003
|
Wonderful!
|
|
|
|
|
Leslie Cohelan
{K:20807} 4/22/2003
|
Looks like a good capture of a starling?...good colors and exposure... you caught all those colors which otherwise might have appeared black...but I am confused...the lens says 420...is that the 300 plus the 14B?...if there is another lense besides the 300 I'm ready to get it...appreciate any info...and again, a beautiful picture
|
|
|
|
|
Benny Smets
{K:2919} 4/22/2003
|
great shot
|
|
0 
