Photograph By The Pilgrim
The P.
Photograph By mike cable
mike c.
Photograph By Andre Denis
Andre D.
Photograph By Jill Bartlett
Jill B.
Photograph By giant bear
giant b.
Photograph By Martin Paul
Martin P.
Photograph By Nigel Watts.
Nigel W.
Photograph By Ian Cameron
Ian C.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Photography Help Forum: 
  Q. Survey - B&W Film and Scanning

Asked by Petros Stamatakos    (K=12101) on 11/8/2001 
1/ What is your all time favourite B&W film?
2/ Do you scan from the negatives or the prints?
3/ When scanning B&W do you scan as Grayscale?

I'd appreciate your input... :-)


    



 al shaikh  Donor  (K=15790) - Comment Date 11/8/2001
1. Don't have one
2. negatives
3. Never always scan in full 48 bit rgb (read the article on scanning if you don't know why)
4. if you want to scan bw well shoot tmax 400cn or ilford xp2 they are chromogenic bw films and will scan far better than the conventional silver halide on the home user level scanners.





 Deleted User   (K=2231) - Comment Date 11/9/2001
Every instance has an optimum type of film to record the scene based on the conditions and effect you want to record. I like Ilford's PAN F but I rate it at EI-20 and the long exposure times only allow for photos that don't require faster shutter speeds. Most B&W film's contrast can be controlled when developing so the "inherent" contrast built into the film is not as important once you understand how each film functions and know how to develop for each circumstance. I shoot 35mm so I always try to bias by film selection toward finer grain when possible. However I shoot HP5 at 1600 and can get good 5x7 prints (minus some shadow detail).

Scanning B&W film is not always easy and the negative is not always the final "interpretation" I want for the image, so sometimes I will make a print and scan it on a flat bed.

I always scan in color and convert it in photoshop to match the print.





 David Chang-Sang   (K=680) - Comment Date 11/19/2001
1) Lately I've been using Ilford Delta 100 and before that I was a long time Tmax user but lately the Delta 100 has been nice. Also I love to use the XP2 and T400CN films for "playing around" with. It doesn't cost me as much to get those puppies developed (I don't have the time or chemicals or equipment currently to develop my own.. else I would)

2) Currently I scan from prints.. one day... somewhere in the near future.. I hope to snag a film scanner and scan direct from negs

3) Again, since I scan from prints, I'm scanning in Grayscale. I don't know what it's going to be like once I get a film scanner.

Cheers,
dave





 Ted Williams   (K=324) - Comment Date 11/20/2001
I shoot Tmax 100 or 400, sometimes Ilford or Plus X, rarely TriX anymore. Medium format negs I have scanned on an Imacon, 16 bit grayscale. 35mm I scan myself on a Polaroid Sprintscan, usually as an RGB black and white positive. Sometimes I scan 8x10 prints on my flatbed, which can be pretty good, occasionally negs though the results are not very good.




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.140625