Photograph By Andrzej Pradzynski
Andrzej P.
Photograph By Vladimir Meshkov
Vladimir M.
Photograph By Christine Adachi
Christine A.
Photograph By Gerhard BuschEFIAP/AFIAP
Gerhard B.
Photograph By Salvador María Lozada
Salvador María L.
Photograph By Roberto Baez Duarte
Roberto B.
Photograph By Piero Falciani
Piero F.
Photograph By Jan Symank
Jan S.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Philosophy Of Photography Forum: 
  Q. when is a digital photo "creative"
Jon O
Asked by Jon O'Brien    (K=11321) on 12/15/2006 
My local camera club is still wrestling with certain aspects of digital photography as it pertains to classification and judging. One of the categories is "Digital - Creative". While some images are obviously products of digital manipulation, at what point does processing end and "creative" begin? By way of a starting point, if I limit myself to the kinds of things which I could do in my darkroom downstairs, eg., dodging, burning, cropping, contrast manipulation and mild toning (warming, mostly, as one might do through the selection of different papers) is this "creative"?


    



 Jeroen Wenting  Donor  (K=25317) - Comment Date 12/15/2006
to me, never.
I loath all those "creative" filters, both digital and real. They completely ruin what might otherwise have been a nice image, or are used in attempts (doomed from the outset) to mask fatal flaws in poor images.

Sometimes a coloured grad filter might give a nice effect, but that's as far as it goes (and as soon as it looks unnatural it's too much, which is very soon if the same effect couldn't have been achieved by taking the image at another time).




Andrzej Pradzynski
 Andrzej Pradzynski   (K=22541) - Comment Date 12/16/2006
Jon,
for me digital and creative have nothing common to be linked by the case. We all want the art to be creative and it doesn't really matter what media one picks. It's more about the talent/skills one have to express things right rather than technique chosen. I know many creative digital artists and I've seen a lot of poor nature art guardians that cannot make sense of their job. I would like see no boundaries for art, Frankly an art can only be good or not be an art.

Anyway I would like to wish Happy Holiday Season for all forum participants.

Cheers for New year too.

NJ




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.1328125