5D mark II vs. EOS Mark II - Camera Equipment News Forum

a. S.	Orazio M.	Maria H.	Chris B.	Gregory M.	Di Ciuccio M.	Dino F.	Jan S.

	Sign Up Now! \| Log In \| Help
	Your photo sharing community!

	Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography! Upload your photos. Award recipients are chosen daily.
Click above to buy imageopolis art for your home or office.	Read About Awards, Featured Critiques and Comments - Click HERE
Check Out Today's Uploads - Click HERE Check Out Timeless Photos From The Past - Click HERE

Share On

Photography Forum: Camera Equipment News Forum:

Q. 5D mark II vs. EOS Mark II

Asked by Andrew George (K=343) on 1/28/2009

Just wondering on which everyone thinks would be a better buy?

Jeroen Wenting

(K=25317) - Comment Date 1/29/2009

For the vast majority of people, either is overkill.

Mark Julian

(K=36866) - Comment Date 2/15/2009

5D Mark II (or just the 5D), then you can use all of the superior Full Frame Canon "L" lenses and also go backward compatible with full frame Canon film bodies - EOS 3 , etc if you ever want to work with film in the future...... This is why "Full Frame" is the only way to go....EVER - Versatility......
Come on Jeroen, be nice (full discloser) - Jeroen hates Canon, Loves Nikon. I think Nikon only recently came out with a "Full Framer"... they're both fine cameras/brands but FULL FRAME is what you wanna keep in mind (like vinyl vs digital sound -Records vs CD's - FILM may make some what of a limited comeback someday. Some purists still only use film - the original still picture art form (besides Painting and Sketching of course). Mark

Log in to post a response to this question

Return To Photography Forum Index

Elapsed Time:: 0.125

Your photo sharing community!