|
|
Ron Wilson
{K:18362} 4/22/2006
|
Inanc, please excuse my ignorance. I can't tell film from digital when it is on my monitor everything becomes pixels to me. I'm at home and it does look better on my better monitor but yes the res. or image quality is still suffering possibly from the scanning process. You got my comment wrt to background and I know that at times the shot is more important than the background. Regards Ron.
|
|
|
|
|
Inanc Tekguc
{K:880} 4/22/2006
|
thanks Ron.
David is right. This is film. But maybe because of scanning or reducing it's size to fit here, it lost some quality. I don't know.
also, what do you mean by choice of bg? background? if so, i get your point. i wish i had more time with her to arrange it. but i got the pic as she was walking by.
|
|
|
|
david henderson
{K:16659} 4/22/2006
|
.....joyful, what a lovely smile, somebody mentioned pixels but this is film isn't it?....looks like it, sepia comes across quite well but I bet it would look pretty shap just b&w as well....good stuff. cheers, david.
|
|
|
|
Leo Régnier Я£
{K:67696} 4/21/2006
|
Very beautiful smile!!!
Leo
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Wilson
{K:18362} 4/21/2006
|
She has a very pretty smile. Loss of pixels hurts this shot. Your choice of bg could be a little more thought out as well. Just a snapshot.
|
|
|
|
metoni .
{K:24727} 4/21/2006
|
very nice portrait photo
|
|
0 
