|
|
Caterina Berimballi
{K:27299} 7/4/2006
|
You have a post work flare all of your own Gayle. A very creative mind. Love the textures and colour in this one.
|
|
|
|
Theresa Rankin
{K:938} 7/3/2006
|
Gayle this one struck me immediately in the thumbnail..first of all because of its overall design and contrast...two things I favor in photography and painting. When I looked at the full image I was then completely blown away! Love all the subtle nuances in color and the light is so moody ...I love this one!
Regards Theresa
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 7/2/2006
|
interesting.. I dont agree with Paul but do believ e that some of the saturations are tad harsh
|
|
|
|
![Nelson Moore [Kes] -](http://images.imageopolis.com/images/5/7/8/7/5787/1481659-micro.jpg)
Nelson Moore [Kes] -
{K:20241} 7/1/2006
|
Interesting piece of work, Gayle, I like it...probably the colors are what grab my eye.
Kes
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 6/30/2006
|
Ok. Thanks for the reminder.
|
|
|
|
Gayle's Eclectic Photos
{K:91109} 6/30/2006
|
hi ya,brat...appreciate that you stopped in to comment,but feel you totally misunderstand photo-art intent.....have attached the original shot which was an ok traditional shot,handheld at late sunset...rather boring to my sensibility,thus why i decided to change it up to be more impressionistic....photo-art often does not have a "central subject" and it is not about having a "critical eye toward focus"...the rules go out the window with "photo-art"...the intrinsic appeal of a holga or pinhole shot is the blur,light leaks and general distortions...my photo-art images are mostly a result of post-processing,tho' some controlled aspects such as dof blurs do occur in-camera.....not trying to put you off about leaving your opin, but remember what i said previously about how we can critique traditional shots,but only say what appeals or not to us subjectively IF it is the person's vision presented as "photo-art"?....when you say,
"This wouldn't have survived the first round I fear."...well,you would never have seen such an imaage first or second round cause it was "created as photo-art" in post-editing! ;>
We can discuss my "recognizing photo-art" course fee later,dude...;>
|
orig. shot before PSP8 photo-art created |
|
|
|
Kamran Bakhtiari
{K:24036} 6/30/2006
|
very well done ,great colors,magic,
Afareen DGG
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 6/30/2006
|
The blurs to the right and top of the image only seem to add to the feeling of overall ....dunno... clutter. It appears to ME to be a pile 'o grass without any central subject.
As you know, I 'shoot like the wind' while I'm out in the field, but I unhesitatingly delete the blurry images or experimental shots that don't jump off the screen at first glance. Then, I take a second pass with an even more critical eye toward focus and balance. This wouldn't have survived the first round I fear.
|
|
|
|
Mark Julian
{K:36866} 6/30/2006
|
Love the colors of confusion with a bit of clarity, Makes me think of the speed of life and the slowness of a pleasant thought from behind between the differnet levels of advice that can easily create a criss cross mind....One of these days/and it won't be long/goin' down to the river/and sing my song - gonna sing it loud/gonna sing it strong/ let the echo decide/if I was right or wrong... Bobby D./Jerry G.
|
|
|
|
Phillip Minnis
{K:13131} 6/30/2006
|
Gayle, you do these so well!
A wonderful conglomeration of colours, lines, textures and lighting! Just like your recent BIP image, these images are unique and mysterious! Well done!
Cheers
Phil
|
|
0 
