|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 1/30/2007
|
OK, now I got it! Well, quite like Hebrew, where the root of the word can take some pre- and/or suffix to produce some other word. The question is if the Klingons have that too! :-)
Qapla'
Nick
|
|
|
|
Annemette Rosenborg Eriksen
{K:55244} 1/30/2007
|
I think it worked well as no clear shades are visible, but only the change of colours show the stitch.
I thought about the snow too, but then I came to think that maybe the title referred to an alphabet built up like Hebro with a ehm...base(donīt know the English term) and then adding a prefix and a suffix almost like the photo with a green bright middle and then the added photos in every end.
Tuttelut
Annemette
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 1/30/2007
|
Thanks a lot for the comment Annemette! Well, I did try to camouflage such differences at the stiching points and it did work, but still... some things could be better.
The snow shapes on the slopes reminded me of some kind of archaic alphabet indeed, but I didn't think of Hebro. Rather something like Klingonian. But what do you mean with prefix and suffix? I didn't get that, sorry.
Ka'blah!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 1/30/2007
|
Thanks a lot, Collin! Not perfect but I like it too. Oh well, being the one that made the stich, my eyes always fall exactly at those points that aren't stiched perfectly, you see...
Best wishes,
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Annemette Rosenborg Eriksen
{K:55244} 1/30/2007
|
I see some slight differences in colour, but they are not that noticable because of the sunlight that hits some areas which makes it look more natural.
Funny title:-) Was the archaic alphabet built up with a prefix and suffix like Hebro? (and your photo in a way;-))
Annemette
|
|
|
|
|
Collin Stebbins
{K:1868} 1/30/2007
|
I think you have done an excellent job of manually stitching. Well done.
Regards,
Collin.
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 1/30/2007
|
Noooo, the truth has to come out and shine under the sun!
So it's at the thirds of the photo where you can see that the coloring visibly changes. I "camouflaged" the stich transitions but the differences in coloring are visible, though one can't really say where the one coloring ends and the other starts. Just "divide" the photo in 3 equal parts along its length, and compare the coloring to the left and to the right of the imaginary "division line".
Oh well, it was one of my firsts :-D
Cheers,
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 1/30/2007
|
Many many thanks for the lovely comment, Susan!
Best wishes,
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 1/30/2007
|
Thank you very much, Joe!
Best wishes,
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 1/30/2007
|
Thanks a lot for the nice comment, Ace!
Best to you,
Nick
|
|
|
|
Andre Denis
{K:66407} 1/30/2007
|
Hi Nick,
I honestly can't tell where you stiched them together. It's funny sometimes when we work on things like this ourselves, our eye goes right to the spot, but others may never suspect unless shown where the join is. Best to keep it a secret :)
Andre
|
|
|
|
Susan Hernandez
{K:6487} 1/29/2007
|
You did a wonderful job on your first try on stiching, looks good and what a gorgeous shot.
|
|
|
|
Joe Brown
{K:23213} 1/29/2007
|
Great shot Nick, excellent panorama.
Regards
Joe
|
|
|
|
Ace Star
{K:21040} 1/29/2007
|
grt work Nick! wonderfull panoramic .... lovely view and atmospher :)
excellent
good luck
|
|
0 
