Photograph By Darryl  Barclay
Darryl  B.
Photograph By Mostafa Tartak
Mostafa T.
Photograph By Robert Gaither
Robert G.
Photograph By Paul Harrett
Paul H.
Photograph By Mohammed Iskhakov
Mohammed I.
Photograph By Michael Fox
Michael F.
Photograph By Karoly Karsay
Karoly K.
Photograph By Armando Giambolini
Armando G.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 


Send this photo as a postcard
what's wrong with this picture
 
Image Title:  what's wrong with this picture
  0
Favorites: 0 
 By: Ian McIntosh  
  Copyright ©2008

Register or log in to view this image at its full size, to comment and to rate it.


This photo has won the following Awards




 Projects & Categories

 Browse Images
  Recent Pictures
  Todays Pictures
  Yesterdays Pictures
  Summary Mode
  All imageopolis Pictures
 
 Award Winners
  Staff Choice
  Editors Choice
  Featured Donors
  Featured Photographers
  Featured Photos
  Featured Critiques
   
 Image Options
  Unrated Images
  Critique Only Images
  Critiquer's Corner
  Images With No Critiques
  Random Images
  Panoramic Images
  Images By Country
  Images By Camera
  Images By Lens
  Images By Film/Media
   
 Categories
   
 Projects
   
 Find Member
Name
User ID
 
 Image ID
ID#
 
   
 Search By Title
 
   

Photographer Ian McIntosh  Ian McIntosh {Karma:42997}
Project N/A Camera Model slarti
Categories Weddings
Film Format
Portfolio Lens sigma lensomatic 28mm2.4
Uploaded 2/13/2008 Film / Memory Type 200
    ISO / Film Speed
Views 658 Shutter
Favorites Aperture f/
Critiques 11 Rating
Pending
/ 2 Ratings
Location City - 
State - 
Country - UF Old Timers   UF Old Timers
About I did 700+ crap prints of nice moments like this. what's wrong?
too clever with the curve?
Colour balance wrong?
Too saturated?
I need to re-look at them all.
Guys I don't want to make 700 more mistakes. Where would you start?
I'm (a bit) red green colour blind but even I can see this is bad. Question is in what manner is it bad.
It's three months overdue now but I haven't the heart tio start looking at them yet.
EXIF Data
Random Pictures By:
Ian
McIntosh


at taieri mouth

moonlight mist and harbour lights

Pedal

pooling light

birthstone

bokeh

thought bubble speak

quiet city

cloudburst in sterile landscape

Ralphs Garden

There are 11 Comments in 1 Pages
  1
H L H L   {K:11377} 2/5/2009
Ian, it seems to me white balance also exposure is the cause of it...
Cheers,
Harry

I will try to post a sample later

  0


Ian McIntosh Ian McIntosh   {K:42997} 4/20/2008
Gidday steve.
I thought I'd avoid corporate tags and name my camera slartibardfarst. Slarti for short. I'm using a lot of of m42s and thought it sounded eastern european like praktica but have been assured by a czech friend that it doesn't.
It's a *istds if you want its proper name but I can't pronounce that.

  0


Steve Marshall   {K:645} 4/20/2008
...and by the way, what on earth is s Slarti?

  0


Steve Marshall   {K:645} 4/20/2008
My 2c worth... I think there's too much background intruding on what you want the viewer to look at, i.e. the 4 people in the foreground. Because it was shot at 28mm focal length it will always have very long DOF, even though you opened up to f2.4. If you stood back and used a medium telephoto (say 100-150mm), and opened THAT up as wide as it can go, the background would blur out beautifully and you'd have an entirely different look.

  0


H L H L   {K:11377} 4/4/2008
Ian, I think you freak out:):):):):):):)You got great presentation of a very important moment, also colors are smooth and pleasant to the eye, Weddings are very hard work plus its very difficult task!!!!!
Great work my friend!!!
Harry

  0


Nick Karagiaouroglou Nick Karagiaouroglou   {K:127263} 2/27/2008
Ian, I think too that the green looks quite "pale" not for itself alone, but in combination to the rather soft appearance of the people in the front and the out of focus people on the background.

So, John's sharpening did bring a bettering in the sense of a better separation of the protagonists against the rest of the scene, but it also amplified the noise like for example on the back of the black jacket at the left, though I still find that this is a more than acceptable price to pay.

But in addition to John's work that bettered the image, I find the toning a bit troublesome. I see almost only pastels here and too much diffuse light, which is often used for such celebrations, but which also makes the atmosphere too "dreamy", too "untouchable", as the contrasts get too weak and the contours a bit fuzzy. It looks washed out then. The problem is that trying to correct it later on always tends to exaggerate the lights and the shadows, and then the image looks like solarized.

Though I am certainly no master of PS, here is what I did. First of all I corrected the color levels. This took away the bit of redish haze over the image and provided a bit more contrast. Then I burned a bit the people in the forground and I sharpend them a bit too for a better separation to the background and for getting some more details of their cloths, hair, and the like. It got a bit better for me but what do you think?

Cheers,

Nick

  0

Another suggestion for manipulation


Ian McIntosh Ian McIntosh   {K:42997} 2/16/2008
Thanks John. The sharpening is an unexpected improvement. I'll hopefully be able to use some in the batching.
I'll show my friend the changes in colour when I get him organised to see.

  0


John Bohner   {K:8368} 2/16/2008
Okay, here is my cut at it below. Changes I made were to brighten the green in levels but not the curve. Same thing with blue. That got the bride's dress to white. No change to overall saturation. Unsharp mask of ~ 23 with a radius of 8 and 0 for the range. that bumps up "local micro contrast" Unsharp mask again of 80 with a radius of 0.5 and 0 for the range to do ordinary sharpness.
Free advice is worth what it costs.

  0

more green and blue, more contrast


Roger Skinner Roger Skinner   {K:81846} 2/13/2008
nothin... stop freakin out

  0


Ian McIntosh Ian McIntosh   {K:42997} 2/13/2008
Gosh even more saturation? I see what you mean about the green thankyou Visar I'll add that to my list of possible fixes (under supervision of someone less colour blind than me).

  0


absynthius . absynthius .   {K:20748} 2/13/2008
hey Ian,
well, my idea is there is nothing wrong with what you have captured here, in fact i think you have captured here a beautiful moment- i think it is not hard at all to see how much is going on out there, two sincere hugs, a boy trying to be part of it, another woman shooting with a camera, another one witnessing this happening with hands in his pocket, and other people too-- a whole scenery.
though, if we go into technicalities, i think i would like to see a bit of more sharpness and a higher saturation of green and that's about it.

all the best,
v.

  0


  1

 

|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 1.578125