|
|
|
Leslie Hancock
{K:910} 10/16/2003
|
I enjoy your dark-flower photos -- the gardenia's also very nice. Just a little extra contrast might give them even more effect. Then again, it's always hard to evaluate gamma on a computer monitor; would have to see the prints.
|
|
|
|
In Transit
{K:29432} 10/6/2003
|
And seemingly today a "FEATURED CRITIQUE"
|
|
|
|
|
B:)liana
{K:30945} 10/5/2003
|
Interesting! A little bit too dark for me. Regards, Biliana
|
|
|
|
|
Ken Tinley
{K:1856} 10/5/2003
|
spider lily indeed.. Good all round peice of art! LUV!
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Katsoulis
{K:1096} 10/4/2003
|
This reminds me of a mysterious deep sea creature. Very interesting. It is a shame the digital artifacts are so strong.
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Miki
{K:671} 10/4/2003
|
I like this shot because it isn't readily apparent what the subject is, until you have a good look at it. All the things I was initially thinking as to the subject were wrong, but still was fun to see.
Nice shot.
|
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 10/4/2003
|
nice flower....
perfect composition
|
|
|
|
ppdix
{K:17069} 10/4/2003
|
Those are some scary looking lilies...
|
|
|
|
|
Fabio Keiner
{K:81109} 10/4/2003
|
oh yes!
|
|
|
|
|
In Transit
{K:29432} 9/28/2003
|
I have taken the liberty of fiddling with this capture....
but without any success...
so can only compliment the protographer on her execution!
|
|
|
|
|
Lexie Summers
{K:2027} 9/16/2003
|
Wow! Beautiful work. The detail in the shadows on the petals are very interesting. Good job getting the background to go dark. I like how there is some visible leaves in the background so it doesn't look like the flower is just floating.
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Barrette
{K:21125} 9/15/2003
|
Image intéressante, plutôt abstraite. Le contraste élevé lui convient très bien. J'ai l'impression cependant que l'image souffre d'un excès de netteté. On y voit quelques artefacts.
|
|
0 
