|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 3/4/2004
|
Jeanette - on the balance I agree with you. The higher contrast may emphasize the expression of displeasure, but I think I like it as a more subtle hint. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 3/4/2004
|
Stefan, I think the first version is better because ít?s softer. The darker one with more contrast does not work so well for me. The triangle is the only thing you should change.
/Jeanette
|
|
|
|
|
Andriete Paris
{K:2381} 3/3/2004
|
Excellent portrait.
Very, very expressive.
Congrats.
|
|
|
|
|
sandy c. hopkins
{K:17107} 3/2/2004
|
the light here is great as well as her expression. i see the triangle as well..the dof blurs it nicely but a light opacity clone will decrease it a bit more.
great job here!
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 3/2/2004
|
I didn't even see the kleenex sticking out like an additional ear before you pointed it out. Just goes to show that you look at your own images differently than you do others... However, we aim to please (see attached image :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telmo Domingues
{K:9639} 3/2/2004
|
There is not much to improve here... Maybe the contrast... a little bit more... Funny... Marybell is right about that triangle but, in my opinion we must not change that much in a photo...
I like the expression of the "model"... Something like... "get rid of that camera!... (but don't go too far... I need you to heat my feet!!)"
Hugs my Friend!
|
|
|
|
|
MaryBell
{K:32791} 3/2/2004
|
I love the lead in through her book. She gazes over it and then we see that annoyed stare - very funny. Tonally, this works well too...I have one problem with it and that is the white triangle protruding from the back right-hand side of her head...it is very distracting as it matches the tones of the book and so I tend to move between it and the book. For digital processing you could clone it out...
|
|
|
|
|
Tomo Radovanovic
{K:12788} 3/2/2004
|
excellent shot at available light
|
|
0 
