|
|
|
Richard Dakin
{K:12915} 5/23/2005
|
Thanks Reza.
|
|
|
|
|
Reza Fakhrai
{K:3014} 5/21/2005
|
I was drawn to the sky on this in contrast to the rougher textures of the brick. Great job.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Dakin
{K:12915} 5/18/2005
|
Thanks again Roby. I think Kodak Tri-X is my favourite film, for the tones.
|
|
|
|
Roberto Arcari Farinetti
{K:209486} 5/18/2005
|
wooww.. stunning ruins!
very well catched and perfect tones in b/W!
a suoperb use of film.. I like it so much!
roby
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Dakin
{K:12915} 5/16/2005
|
Thanks Mary, I have to admit I still prefer film for B+W.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 5/16/2005
|
The filter is great for this shot. Good detail and composition.
Mary
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Dakin
{K:12915} 5/15/2005
|
Thanks Rebecca.
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca Raybon
{K:26654} 5/15/2005
|
Great contrast in this one Richard. Beautiful!
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Dakin
{K:12915} 5/15/2005
|
Thanks again Fadel. I am starting to get the hang of B+W conversions, but I still prefer Kodak Tri-X film. I do think your B+W conversions are excellent however. The only real difference I see, is that your images do not have the grain that a film like Tri-X or Plus-X has.
|
|
|
|
Fadel J
{K:13974} 5/15/2005
|
very strong BW tones dear Richard, I guess because it's real BW! :)
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Dakin
{K:12915} 5/15/2005
|
Thanks Ehdae.
|
|
|
|
|
Ehdae (Abullha AL Hazza)
{K:4725} 5/14/2005
|
This is real good work Richard...Very beautiful B&W and great composition!
|
|
0 
