|
|
Mervo
{K:8643} 11/8/2005
|
Like Danny said, promising, you have to have that RAW don't you Ade, I know it has saved me several times and the editing options compared to JPG is much improved. Looking forward to seeing the adjusted image, because the good composition is there already.
|
|
|
|
|
ade mcfade
{K:12388} 11/8/2005
|
Hi Steve,
you've beaten me to it! That's exactly what I was going to do - just that I didn't ahve enought time last night to ndo any editing, so posted the "Uncut" version!
I'd taken a meter reading from the sky so that didn't butn out so had to puy up with a dark foreground. I'll probably give it a little attention at some point, but it'll look pretty much like your work!
Chhers
Ade
|
|
|
|
Ann Nida
{K:45248} 11/8/2005
|
Great perspective and wonderful clarity and detail as usual. I forgot that you always shoot RAW ...don't you?. I must remember to do that from now on and see if I get some improvements in my images.
Another winner Ade. Cheers - Ann :)
|
|
|
|
Steve Aronoff
{K:18393} 11/8/2005
|
Personally, I find the buildings too dark and the sky too light. I tried a little experiment by replacing the sky with grey and increasing the contrast a bit. I hope you like the result.
|
|
|
|
|
Mohsen Bayramnejad
{K:21377} 11/7/2005
|
very well Architecture composition,as well!..just superb!..Love it!!7+
Cheers,
Mohsen
|
|
|
|
Branimir Fagarazzi
{K:38367} 11/7/2005
|
Nice shot
|
|
|
|
|
ade mcfade
{K:12388} 11/7/2005
|
yeah - like the cobbles and kept the sky at + 1 2/3 so should ahve something to play with
|
|
|
|
|
Danny Brannigan
{K:19523} 11/7/2005
|
promising.
|
|
0 
