Photograph By Hassan **
Hassan *.
Photograph By Marian Man
Marian M.
Photograph By Barbara Socor
Barbara S.
Photograph By Aparajito Seth
Aparajito S.
Photograph By Andre Denis
Andre D.
Photograph By Ayan Mukherjee
Ayan M.
Photograph By Gustavo Scheverin
Gustavo S.
Photograph By Jony Nasser
Jony N.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Camera Equipment News Forum: 
  Q. Zoom Telephoto EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS (Image Stabilizer) USM Autofocus Lens

Asked by Arek S.    (K=32) on 7/21/2003 
Any words about this lens,samples are appreciated.I am thinking of buy one,thanks.


    



 Chris Moore   (K=5591) - Comment Date 7/22/2003
Hi Arek,
I have this lens, and absolutely love it - I've used it in all manner of situations, including extremely low light work - concerts and circuses. It's extremely sharp, the image stabilising really makes a massive difference to the usability of the lens.
What else... well, it's heavy - very heavy if you're not used to pro lenses. However it has it's own tripod mount which is very useful and makes a fine hand hold also I find. I'd be wary of mounting it on a cheap body because of the forward weight and strain on the lens mounting collar.
The push-pull zoom style has come in for some criticism by some users, as many lenses like this can get water inside - I don't think this is a problem with this lens, which is environmentally sealed all over.
There's a zoom locking collar which stops the push-pull from sliding out if the camera is held around your neck. Very nice - I used to have a push pull that would slide out to maximum as soon as you lowered it, which was very annoying.
There's a focus limiter to minimise hunting though I've found the lens focuses beautifully when coupled with my eos3 even in very low light. The performance with less expensive bodies is reduced (naturally since most of the AF work is a result of the body).
Additionally, not sure if this is the case with _all_ image stabilising lenses, but it has two stabilising modes, one for panning and one for handholding steady.

Suggest you try the lens out at a shop for it's weight and because it's an expensive purchase. Also I put a high quality UV filter on the front before it even left the shop and have never taken it off - the front element is too precious on my budget!

Here are some samples:
http://www.usefilm.com/image/16358.html
http://www.usefilm.com/image/108742.html
http://www.usefilm.com/image/110149.html
Finally, I think this attached image (though not in my portfolio) is a good example of the lens' capability - this guy was doing a handstand at the top of the big top of a circus, in extremely low light. The shutter speed was about 1/45 at 400mm - well below recommended even with IS, but I often shoot slower than recommended. The scan is "ok", but on the print you can see ever hair and every glisten of sweat.

Hope that helps
Chris








 Arek S.   (K=32) - Comment Date 7/22/2003
thank's for info ,i am gonna use this lens with eos d10





 Chris Moore   (K=5591) - Comment Date 7/24/2003
Hi Arek,

Interesting - I have the lens and I'm thinking of getting a 10D. The two should work incredibly well together because of the 10D crop factor - it becomes a mammoth of a lens. Let me know how you get on!

I've also used the lens with 1.4x teleconverter (the Canon one) - this works pretty well though it becomes a little dark. With the 10D you won't need this I expect!

Chris




Matt Davis
 Matt Davis   (K=3935) - Comment Date 8/18/2003
Arek.

I've been considering this lens for some time but have weighed up the option of buying the 70-200 2.8 and a converter instead. This would give faster speed at 200mm and also keep up with the max aperture at 400mm with a converter on. Cost and functionality are the draw backs I believe.

The links below are replies from my forum questions on this matter. I still haven't made a purchase (as they are bloody expensive) but thought this info may be of use.

http://www.usefilm.com/photo_forum/1/2593/Canon_70-200f2.8_with_2x_Converter_or_100-400mmf4-5.6.html

http://www.usefilm.com/photo_forum/15/2549/Canon_70-200f2.8_with_2x_Converter_or_100-400mmf4-5.6.html

Chris' shots rae pretty good with the 400mm lens and as he mention you can usually hand hold much lower than suggested with teh IS as I have found this with my 28-135 version.

There are also many review on the internet about this lens (and the 70-200) and from all my trauling it's very difficult to find a bad word about either. The push/pull zoom operation does apparently take some getting used to and this was an operation that I was unsure about.

Still, try it in your camera shop for handling and performance, just make sure you've got the bank loan agreed as I'm sure you'll want it the moment it's pulled from the box - It is a white 'L' series lens after all!

Ohhh someone did mention it on the link I've included but for good measure the best comment on their was 'this lens makes people think you're a pro'! For me there's no other better reason to buy it! LOL.

Rgds.
Matt




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.140625