|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 4/15/2006
|
I do like this B&W version, Roger. All the interesting lines and features are still very evident. Somehow, though, I find myself seing more of the details in this. In the coloured version, I think I was looking too many places too places being drawn by the colours. Here, I find I am scanning across more slowly enjoying the many details even more. Mary
|
|
|
Ian V
{K:1730} 4/7/2006
|
Nice tones, great perspective, i love your panoramas some of the best ive seen.
|
|
|
Ahmet Baki Kocaballi
{K:13618} 4/3/2006
|
Hi Roger, thank you very much for your gift : ) i very like this version in b/w, forms,curves and shadows became more dominant than the previous one.. i have been a bit busy for a month thus cannot follow the friends in usefilm, but i will try to catch :) take care Baki
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 3/22/2006
|
Well, George, to be honest it is mostly a matter of deciding where to plonk the tripod or unipod. This is good for a photographer of very modest talents like myself, and one of the reasons I do so many panoramas. To tell you how independent panoramas are of the photographer's eye, my rotary panorama camera doesn't even have a VIEWFINDER! What you see--looking around you--is what you get.
|
|
|
George Marks
{K:15437} 3/22/2006
|
An awesome shot Roger. I can see where you really have to plan out the details of your panoramic shots.
|
|
|
João F * Photography
{K:41945} 3/21/2006
|
i like it in B&W dear roger well done my friend!!! joão
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 3/21/2006
|
Incredible - yes the b/w highlights the forms more then colours do! I like it better as b/w.
Jeanette
|
|