|
|
Matej Maceas
{K:24381} 6/2/2003
|
Mark, just a quick note. I've looked at the saturated version and I think that indeed it does make the scene stronger. The original post is a bit faded out (that's why I mentioned lighting in the previous comment); the enhanced colours liven up the photo.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark McGloughlin
{K:437} 6/1/2003
|
Massimo: I have a version with PS super saturated colours. It does look good and in fact, when I looked at your portfolio, it is quite similar!!
|
|
|
|
|
Massimo Di Maggio
{K:-53658} 6/1/2003
|
Good eye Mark, the right subject for illustrate lines, in my opinion maybe better if more contrasted and saturated (if you want look at my similar image). Regards Massimo
|
|
|
|
|
Mark McGloughlin
{K:437} 6/1/2003
|
Matej: I agree with your comment. The chaotic growth is in fact another line, running horizontally in the frame. I have many shots from this scene - I will review and look for something better. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Matej Maceas
{K:24381} 6/1/2003
|
The chaotic growth in the foreground spoils the abstractish line effect, whilst not really providing a focal point that would contrast with the lines and textures. Perhaps you could crop it off? Also I don't see anything that would be quite in focus. Have you tried photographing this scene at different times of day, with different lighting conditions?
|
|
|
|
Jose Ignacio (Nacho) Garcia Barcia
{K:96391} 6/1/2003
|
beautiful details.
|
|
|
|
|
J. Smith
{K:638} 6/1/2003
|
Nice lines
|
|
0 
