|
|
|
Francesca May
{K:6877} 2/25/2004
|
BELLISSIMA!!
|
|
|
|
Rob Holschbach
{K:2748} 9/23/2002
|
Recovery work looks good Russ. I like the compostion. When I take digi's of my varmits, I usually set for degrees of a little under exposure. However, I can see how your arrangement would have been hard to recognize with under exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Scheuern
{K:1428} 9/23/2002
|
I cdertainly wouldn't have known it was badly underexposed if you hadn't said so. I like the space above and the texture of the carpet as well as Larry himself. Nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
Russ Cooper
{K:759} 9/22/2002
|
Thanks to you all for the encouraging words. Maybe someday with your help I'll be able to rely more on skill and experience than good luck and Paint Shop Pro!
|
|
|
|
|
Dawna G.
{K:7709} 9/22/2002
|
agreed, nice image, good composition and love the bw.
|
|
|
|
jeff lynch
{K:4770} 9/22/2002
|
Good comp and a very good photo rescue here Russ! Nice work man. The b&w works very well here.
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Needham
{K:2482} 9/22/2002
|
Lovely picture. My dog is also black and white, and so, she looks good in greyscale!!
I agree with Kim about the space above. At first I thought a crop was in order, but I've changed my mind. The space works well.
Sarah
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 9/22/2002
|
What a great portrait! I like the negative space above the dog, as it lends to the fact that this is a smaller dog, not needing all the extra space. As well, the detail in the fur and highlights in the eyes are wonderful.
For being severly unexposed you've done a great job of restoring it, as it looks quite natural, although if you had taken the pic correctly the first time, the result might have looked like this anyways, so you wouldn't have needed the PS work.
|
|
0 
