|
|
|
James Bambery
{K:13421} 6/26/2005
|
Thanks Paul, I am aware of that. It just seems simpler to give the actual lens focal length w/o the conversion and assume that most people will know there is a difference. It helps keeps most of the non aware folks from asking me how I got 640 mm. with a 400 mm. lens:)and my having to reply.
That could possibly be a good forum topic. What focal length should be listed. The camera reads it w/o the conversion yet most of us know there is an added length. Hmmm. Anyways thatnks for the comment.
Take Care
Jim
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 6/26/2005
|
Acually, James, your focal length was actually 640mm (you need to factor in the 1.6 to compare with 35mm equivalents when using the 20D).
Oh, and sure thing. You NAILED this one!!
|
|
|
|
Alison DuFlon
{K:36566} 6/25/2005
|
Perfect, I didn't think these guys ever settled down. Beautifully taken James. from where are you taking the shots, that they don't fly off. Alison
|
|
|
|
Rick Koth
{K:2971} 6/25/2005
|
OH THIS MAKES ME MAD! Just because I'm jealous. I actually saw a female about ten minutes ago. She did'nt hang around very long. Great photo, another 7.
|
|
|
|
Judi Liosatos
{K:34047} 6/25/2005
|
Beautiful. Great DOF.
Judi
|
|
|
|
ARMANDO ALCÁZAR
{K:42404} 6/24/2005
|
7+++++++++++++++ simply wonderful, perfect!!! congrats and God bless you 
|
|
|
|
|
Darlene Boucher
{K:15739} 6/24/2005
|
I do agree....PERFECT!!! Incredible colors, beautiful pose, WOW!!!
|
|
|
|
|
James Bambery
{K:13421} 6/24/2005
|
Thanks Petal, I was wondering if someone would notice that. I did:) I think it is probably a sharpening halo. I am still working on perfecting my sharpening technique and because of the color of the background it just seemed to be a little more enhanced. It does not show up on my master version here at home but the compression or something pulled it out on the upload.
Jim
|
|
|
|
Petal Wijnen
{K:50989} 6/24/2005
|
Yeah, you can say that again.... WOW... what a catch!! Super DOF, colors, detail and composition.... well done!!! I've got only one little question... there seems to be somekind of a 'halo' around this stunning bird.... is that because of the use of PS or just because of the focus/blurred background??
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Cartwright
{K:52046} 6/24/2005
|
Well Jime!...it's Got tobe Where you Live...to be able to take such....Superb...Nature Shots!!!
Another Exceptional....Capture....7/7!!!
Best Regards:
Jeff.
|
|
|
|
Mark Kresl
{K:9434} 6/24/2005
|
WOW! James. This is perfect in every way. Almost as if he was posing for you. Excellent shot.
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
cessy karina
{K:14205} 6/24/2005
|
fabulous !
beautiful bird with gorgeous colors
very nice shot
|
|
|
|
|
Laurie Gould
{K:11942} 6/24/2005
|
This is stunning! The dof is superb and the details are fantastic. great capture! 7+ :)
|
|
|
|
Larry Quigley
{K:12887} 6/24/2005
|
WOW! is right, Jim. Perfect light, perfect setting and perfect pose! And you forgot to include perfect color. Those colors are nearly irridecent. Good job! Best wishes and thank you for your kind comments on my pictures. Larry
|
|
|
|
|
SONNY RODRIGUE
{K:387} 6/24/2005
|
EXCELLENT PICTURE OF A FACINATING BIRD. WE ARE WAITING FOR THEM TO COME BACK SOUTH BREFORE GIONG ON THEIR MIGRATION.
SONNY
|
|
|
|
|
matthew morgan
{K:1539} 6/24/2005
|
your heading sums it all up amazing colors detail the whole over all pic is great
|
|
|
|
|
Roberto Okamura
{K:22851} 6/24/2005
|
Excellent capture Jim!
Very beautiful hummingbird!
Congrats!
Roberto.
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 6/24/2005
|
Beautiful shot, Jim! Exquisite colouring on this one!
Dave.
|
|
0 
