Photograph By a. Scarabeo
a. S.
Photograph By Ms. Mel Brackstone
Ms. Mel B.
Photograph By Salvador Marķa Lozada
Salvador Marķa L.
Photograph By Ali Naghizadeh
Ali N.
Photograph By Shirley D. Cross-Taylor
Shirley D. C.
Photograph By David Rodriguez
David R.
Photograph By Jill Bartlett
Jill B.
Photograph By Nelson Moore [Kes] - 
Nelson Moore [Kes] -  .
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 

Un-Filtered Critiques
 Most Recent
 Critique Only
 Featured

By Category
By Project

 Find Member
Name
User ID



Critiques From 


<    16  17  18  19  20


Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
6/25/2003 12:24:15 PM

Snehendu,

Excellent composition, though the moon is overexposed. With your lens, you should be able to get individual craters resolved. But in this image it seems to work. Nice job. Try shooting the moon from a tripod with this lens in a variety of phases. The contrast of a quarter moon makes a wonderful target.

Taras
        Photo By: Snehendu Kar  (K:2427)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
6/19/2003 4:11:20 PM

Ann,

This may fit well for the project "Blue" .

Taras
        Photo By: Anyki .  (K:1381)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/29/2003 6:07:59 PM

Maura,

One of those bugs ain't no lady! Great composition in this macro.

Taras
        Photo By: maura faessen  (K:237)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/27/2003 5:01:31 PM

Dan,

The sky is gorgeous, and the image has good contrast and colors. It is easy to overexpose a shot like this, which you did not do. I would have tried to make the right edge of the central tower as vertical as possible. As a result, the chruch tower in the right half wouldn't be leaning quite as much.

Taras
        Photo By: Dan Bachmann  (K:931)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/27/2003 4:54:21 PM

Steve,

This image is overexposed. an exposure between 1/2 and 2 seconds would probably been better for this eclipse at your aperture/ASA combination. I am assuming that only some of the white spots are stars and the streaks are some sort of dust. With the overexposure, it is difficult to tell if your focus is on or not. http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=134027 is a 5 second exposure at 350mm with a slower film to show what sort of detail is possible. I have a pair of eclipse shots up also, but they are taken through clouds, but the one during totality http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=142292 shows the red color of the eclipse, though it is a bit underexposed due to the clouds I was shooting through.

Taras
        Photo By: Steve LaBoon, Jr.  (K:626)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/27/2003 4:35:07 PM

Nicola,

You have good detail in the outer nebula, but the central portion is washed out. Try masking the highlights and using the detail from the shorter exposures to build your composite. You can get more help on the APML (Astrophotography Maillist) which I highly recommend. M42 should have some blue in it, but E200 doesn't capture it well.

Taras

P.S. Most of my photos are taken in the Catskills, though I have made a few attempts in the city. My web site has an M42 photo taken from my roof in NYC http://homepage.mac.com/tarashnat/astrophoto/0004-26.html in a one minute exposure.
        Photo By: Nicola Speri  (K:71)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/27/2003 4:11:50 AM

And this is what you could pick up on the belt with an appropriate film. Mind you, both of these exposures were 30 minutes long, and manually guided.

Taras
        Photo By: Nicola Speri  (K:71)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/27/2003 4:08:11 AM

Nicola,

Try this shot next time with a film that has better red response. Many of Orion's treasures glow in the Hydrogen alpha wavelength (656nm if I'm not mistaken). Kodak Ektachrome E200 and Fuji Provia 400 are two films that seem to be the best for this sort of work. They happen to be slide films, all the good negative films have been discontinued. The Orion Nebula should appear pinkish, and the Flame and Horsehead nebulae did not appear; they would be to the left of the left most star of the belt. Also, if you are shooting from a dark site, try a longer exposure if you are careful with polar aligning your mount. The attached photo shows what color you can get with a decent film. This was the old Supra 400 and a 200mm lens on a Minolta body. The new formulation has lost the red response.

Taras
        Photo By: Nicola Speri  (K:71)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/23/2003 6:47:09 AM

The centering has everything to do with cropping. I did a quick and dirty crop on the partial phase. The original on that was better centered. Image http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=134027 shows what this lens is capable of. My original plan was to use the 8" telescope to photograph the moon during the eclipse and to use a 50mm lens on the Hassy to compose a time sequence multiple exposure. Well, as you said, nature wasn't too cooperative.

Taras
        Photo By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/23/2003 6:38:31 AM

Great work. I was wondering how you got Snickers to sit still with the camera so close until I looked at the lens you were using.

Taras
        Photo By: Daniel L Quigley-Skillin  (K:1383)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/23/2003 6:32:26 AM

Daniel,

The predawn colors are beautiful.

Taras
        Photo By: Daniel L Quigley-Skillin  (K:1383)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/23/2003 4:42:34 AM

I used Logitech's QuickCam software for Mac OS 9. No payloads on Ariane rockets nor DOS/Windows? software was used in the creation of this image.

Check out the QuickCam and Unconventional Imaging Astronomy Group at http://www.qcuiag.co.uk/ for info on how to use a lowly web cam for astronomy.

Taras
        Photo By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/22/2003 3:42:23 PM

Geoff

It looks like the Canon and Minolta 135mm f/2.8 lenses are both of high quality. See http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=106935 for my take on the North America Nebula's place in the Milky Way. Try a longer exposure on this target if you get the opportunity or an autoguider.

Taras

P.S. This image belongs in the landscape category (See http://www.usefilm.com/categories.php ).
        Photo By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/21/2003 10:44:11 PM

The biggest problem was the clouds I was shooting through. Just a look at the shape of the "shadow" shows more than just the earth's umbra. Those are clouds. If it wasn't for the 98-101% overcast skies, I would have used the LX200. The uncropped original isn't as off-center as you may think... see attached.

Taras
        Photo By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/21/2003 10:16:34 PM

This is the best moon shot that I have seen with such a wide lens. And capturing the earthshine so nicely. And as a bonus you have a few stars as well. I have a similar shot, but with a much longer lens: http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=134027

Taras
        Photo By: Nicola Speri  (K:71)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/21/2003 9:46:22 PM

Nice work. The exposure is long enough to get great colors, yet short enough so that the full moon does not look like a sausage. Well done.

Taras
        Photo By: Maurilio Ultramari  (K:8200)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/20/2003 10:10:57 PM

Geoff,

Nice individual exposures, but this image would be stronger if you paid attention to the positioning of the elements in this composition. If the moon was not overlapping the tower, this would be an excellent example of a double exposure adding the moon.

Taras
        Photo By: Geoff Powers  (K:66)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/20/2003 3:24:48 PM

I assume that you just cropped the image without scaling it. This lens sure has great resolution. The focus is bang on, does this lens have a stop at infinity?

Taras
        Photo By: Zoltan Kakuszi  (K:27)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/18/2003 10:16:43 PM

Bill,

Two of my Hassy shots did come out despite the cloud cover we had... Here is the peek I had during totality.

Taras
        Photo By: Bill Ciavarra  (K:10216)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/18/2003 8:11:16 PM

Bill,

The dot in the lower right is an airplane strobe. That is in the line of an airplane trail. The satellite is a faint diagonal line near the center of the photo. There is an orange streak in Camelopardalis on the left edge, which I have no idea what it is--my first "UFO"?

Taras
        Photo By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/16/2003 7:49:58 PM

Kelly, the city lights have no effect on lunar observation/photography. The moon, even in eclipse, is too bright to be effected much by city lights.

Bill, great shot, considering your equipment. I was planning on shooting with my telescope (1280mm focal length), but for the most part got clouded out.

Taras
        Photo By: Bill Ciavarra  (K:10216)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/16/2003 3:48:45 PM

A very striking image. Now I know what the phrase porcelain skin refers to.
        Photo By: Rita jensen  (K:184)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/16/2003 3:41:22 PM

Nice colors on the moon. I could not detect any color visually from NYC because of all the cloud cover. I did get a peek during ingress and and one during totality, but I will find out later if either of those two attempts yeilded any useful results.
        Photo By: Brian Schneider  (K:313)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/16/2003 9:09:20 AM

This has great contrast for a full moon photo. Was this post processed?

Taras
        Photo By: Zoltan Kakuszi  (K:27)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/15/2003 5:15:02 AM

Beautiful shot. I like the swan's reflection.
        Photo By: luisa vassallo  (K:28230)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/14/2003 10:02:28 PM

Excellent timing. A great capture.

Taras
        Photo By: Jim Christensen  (K:18843)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/14/2003 9:54:22 PM

This is a very nice capture of the moon. The focus is crisp and the exposure is almost perfect. Nice work.

Taras
        Photo By: Maverick Fung  (K:89)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/14/2003 9:51:04 PM

Maverick,

Nice shot of Orion. Have you tried longer exposures? That should bring out Barnard's Loop more.

Taras
        Photo By: Maverick Fung  (K:89)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/14/2003 9:38:05 PM

... and some guy with a shiny box wakes me up with a 'click'...

Nice capture.

Taras
        Photo By: John Jackson  (K:1738)

Critique By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)  
5/14/2003 9:26:35 PM

Here is a little guide to the stars in the shot.

Taras
        Photo By: Taras R. Hnatyshyn  (K:4055)


<    16  17  18  19  20


|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 1.140625