|
|
Critique By:
Jani Salvataggio (K:27283)
11/5/2004 2:09:25 PM
Fantastic colours, great composition!!!
regards
Jani
|
Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
micky waby (K:9141)
10/22/2004 1:44:39 AM
Congrats on the SC Award,elegant flower image with lovely lighting and good choice of DOF
Well done!
Regards micky.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Kurt LaRue (K:5067)
10/21/2004 5:42:09 PM
Masterful control of light, Roy. That's what it's all about. Congratulations on the well deserved SC. Kurt
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Diego Ruggiero (K:10659)
10/21/2004 4:33:19 PM
beautiful!!!
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Peace (K:1453)
10/21/2004 9:50:37 AM
Beautiful !!!!!
Peace
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Rose Hooper (K:899)
10/16/2004 11:28:50 PM
Hi Eric,
This was a 30 second exposure after sunset, shot in Ogunquit, ME.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Rebecca M (K:259)
10/16/2004 11:12:00 PM
This worked well, I may have color corrected it as it has a slight magenta hue. Nice dreamy feeling.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
ken krishnan (K:19102)
10/16/2004 8:53:57 PM
Lovely
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Ahmet Baki Kocaballi (K:13618)
10/16/2004 8:32:02 PM
excellent capture
congrats
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Alex Gonzàlez (K:78)
10/16/2004 6:35:12 PM
Bastante rico el color final de la composiciòn, los clars en los pètalos!
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Chris Hunter (K:25634)
10/16/2004 5:21:22 PM
A nice floral shot...the white highlights on the petals add much for, deserves far more comments...but congrats on awards.
Chris
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Jeroen Wenting (K:25317)
10/16/2004 5:08:14 PM
Excellent image. Really like the creamy quality to the wave action.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Eric Goldwasser (K:4294)
10/16/2004 4:58:06 PM
This is awesome Roy. How long was the exposure? 30? or more? Would love to see a print of this. Where'd you shoot it?
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Rebecca Raybon (K:26654)
10/16/2004 4:20:50 AM
Beautiful bw! Excellent tones, contrast, dof..Very dserving of many awrds. COngrats on this recognition!
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Darrell Larose (K:736)
10/14/2004 12:23:01 AM
I would do a slight colour correction to keep the roadway grey. It probably was warmish because of the light filtering through the leaf canopy. With PhotoShop it is easy to locally colour correct the asphalt to be neutral. The brain plays tricks whaen we perceive something to be off colour.
Nice S-Curve which is a very strong compositional element. The colours a lovely. I would have taken this as well and then maybe waited for a second shot with a human element. Wait for a appropiate coloured sports car, bike whatever. This is not to say this shot isn't a wonderful image. You could have a series of winners from one shoot.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Darrell Larose (K:736)
10/14/2004 12:14:04 AM
Does it come with wafers...
I think you are influenced by my "found numbers" series, here is a number 6. Maybe a ISO boost to allow a bit more DOF, which is hard to do on this guys.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Djordje Jovicic (K:919)
10/13/2004 9:17:46 AM
fantastic colors! bravo...
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Gerry Pacher (K:7303)
10/13/2004 5:41:44 AM
Dear Roy,
this is a very beautiful composition. Congratulation.
Regards, Gerry
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Gerry Pacher (K:7303)
10/13/2004 5:35:48 AM
Dear Roy,
woouuw - these are beautiful colors. Great work!
Regards, Gerry
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Bob Botts (K:414)
10/13/2004 5:28:21 AM
Very nice Roy.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Patrick Ziegler (K:21797)
10/13/2004 5:16:50 AM
Roy, It's a fantastic image. I should have never screwed with it. The more I look at it the more I like it. It must be a wonderfull drive down that road.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Rose Hooper (K:899)
10/13/2004 5:08:09 AM
I meant to say that the posted image is not precicely what the camera saw. I did what I would consider to be the appropriate adjustments to the raw image file before posting.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Stephen Bivens (K:7308)
10/13/2004 5:07:52 AM
Very nice.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Patrick Ziegler (K:21797)
10/13/2004 5:05:21 AM
Roy, Now I feel bad. I didn't mean for you to change it. If UF would let me re rate it I would give a 7+ over the 6 I originaly gave it. Maybe one of these next viewers would be so kind. By the way your entire portfolio is awsome!
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Rose Hooper (K:899)
10/13/2004 4:54:27 AM
Hey Pat -- The image is changed from the original. It has more contrast, a tad more saturation, and has had the white balance adjusted (as if I had used a warming filter and velvia).
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Rose Hooper (K:899)
10/13/2004 4:50:34 AM
You're seeing three things going on that give the apparent softness that may not be obvious in such a small version. This is a longer exposure - 1/6th of a second. This is a telephoto image (70mm x 1.6). There is intentional camera shake on the tripod (used my hand to operate the shutter) to soften the edges of the leaves a bit more.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Marcus Peters (K:1182)
10/13/2004 4:41:25 AM
I too think I prefer the origional. However, I might suggest a little more DOF next time. That tree in the center of the road in the back is a bit out of focus and I think it would feel better to me if it wasn't.
Just a thought.
Cheers
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Patrick Ziegler (K:21797)
10/13/2004 4:37:04 AM
Don't get me wrong, your photo is great. I ment no offense. I just like darker more moody scenes. If I hade taken that shot I would be too proud to change a thing also.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Petros Stamatakos (K:12101)
10/13/2004 4:36:52 AM
Hmmm... I have to say that I absolutely love this photo. Beautiful composition, and lovely pastel colors.
I looked at Pat's version, and it's definitely a lot more contrasty than the original upload... Some people would probably prefer the "corrected" version. On my (calibrated) monitor, the original is, (I suspect) more accurate. It seems that in the digital age that we live in, our perception dictates that the more saturated an image is, the better. I try very hard not to fall in that trap, and at times fail.
Roy, I'm glad that you refrained from boosting saturation and contrast. This is much more natural and pleasing. In my humble opinion, this is a wall-hanger. Well done!
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Rose Hooper (K:899)
10/13/2004 4:22:52 AM
To be honest, I don't like it overly contrasty and over-sharpenned. The full resolution file looks nice and sharp and detailled after a tad of unsharp mask and pushing the contrast/gamma up too high doesn't look good on my (calibrated) monitor. The oranges turn red, and the greens turn black.
|
| Photo By: Rose Hooper
(K:899)
|
|
