|
|
George Black
{K:102014} 5/21/2006
|
Thanks, Larry. You're right, of course. This has been an interesting experiment since usually we're trying to improve the image rather than to degrade it. I will post just a few more. Let me know what you think . . .
|
|
|
|
Larry Quigley
{K:12887} 5/21/2006
|
Oh I like this, George. The antique look is pretty good. I would suggest that you do not use the grainy effect. Most of the old pictures were shot in large format and were Very sharp. I like the expressions and the composition on this. Well done! Larry
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Slade
{K:40338} 5/20/2006
|
Really like this- love the texture and frame- it does look almost timeless George.
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 5/20/2006
|
Nice retro look, but I think a faded/grunge would work better than excessive grain, George.
|
|
|
|
Larry Fosse
{K:66493} 5/20/2006
|
I like it...to me anyway it gets a bit closer to antique...now you've got me doing it...I tinkered with your previous post..see what you think
|
War |
|
|
|
Quix Photography
{K:20204} 5/19/2006
|
Love the perspective here... think this one would come out better in comparison to the head on shot they are posing for. Excellent. Think the noise helps with the 'auld' effect, though maybe a little overdone here... just my view though (I'm less noisey in photo's than I am in person.. lol) x
|
|
0 
