|
|
|
Graham Mulrooney
{K:15728} 1/31/2004
|
This is great Dan really caught well. I wondered why you used 1/250 with ISO 400 when you could have used ISO 100 at 1/60 and less noise. This must have been a really bright moon.
Regards'
Graham.
|
|
|
|
|
Heather Tomas-Allem
{K:1064} 1/30/2004
|
Great moon shot! I love taking these.
|
|
|
|
Manish Bosmiya
{K:-32} 1/22/2004
|
this is excellent shot. congrats
|
|
|
|
|
Iain Macadie
{K:1092} 1/15/2004
|
Great Photo, The detail is superb, I have tried to do this, but it never works well.
Regards, Iain
|
|
|
|
|
Kingsley Orsmond
{K:369} 1/11/2004
|
Hi Dan, awesome photo
Took one on 08 Jan 2004 at 10Pm , Funny to see the placing of the "navel" on your photo compared to mine. (http://www.usefilm.com/image/281086.html)
Kingsley
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Mitchell
{K:68} 1/9/2004
|
Hey, you critiqued my shot of Castle Geyser. Yeah I only had two days in the park so a good sky was out of the question. I just saw this add in the paper asking for a photographer willing to travel out of town in 3 different states that takes photos of Gymnastics, Martial Arts, and Dance... sounds alot like what you do?
|
|
|
|
Shaun Rullens
{K:2732} 1/9/2004
|
great shot!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Byrd
{K:255} 1/9/2004
|
Nice job Dan. I have compared my moon shot to yours and have determined that the Canon 1D seems to be far superior to my old Nikon D1. The noise levels in your shot @ 400ISO are far superior to my shot @ 200 ISO. Were you able to use autofocus with your teleconvertor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Sveidq
{K:764} 1/6/2004
|
Great shot!
We have an endless fscination of the moon eh?
|
|
|
|
|
Brendon Cordero
{K:3524} 1/6/2004
|
Nice moon shot, and I am not talking about a rear end.
Did you ever solved that dust problem? Please let me know how it came out.
|
|
|
|
|
David Stevens
{K:803} 1/6/2004
|
dan-this is an excellent shot of the moon-very nicely done.
|
|
0 
