|
|
|
Aurore Lynch
{K:1687} 7/23/2004
|
woah - SO blatanly sexual, caught my eye at once. I agree with Chris VW on not usually liking flower shots. But this is indeed more interesting than the norm. My suggestion; let it ALL be out of focus, rather than trying to get it all IN focus. Could add more interest. Well, as far as the sexual implications go. Maybe also burn in the interior a bit to add more mystery of sorts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Van Wick
{K:14} 6/17/2004
|
I usually hate flower shots, I'm glad someone can put interest into it.
|
|
|
|
|
David Cohen
{K:1759} 4/19/2004
|
Interesting shot... Is this what would appeal to a flower gynecologist. I guess that would be a Botanist.
I am looking for a few good people to critic my work, If you have some time can you check out some of my photos. Thanks
David Tuttle Cohen
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 4/10/2004
|
Chris, try dodging the darker areas in Photoshop using soft light brush with white, and settings turned down to around 15 - 20%...something like this?
|
shadows lightened w/ soft light brush |
|
|
|
|
Ron Beezley
{K:2834} 4/10/2004
|
Interesting shot.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Hayward
{K:1519} 4/10/2004
|
Andy - Yes focus was a problem. I thought I was focused on the nearest point - but that isn't what is shown. The lenes only goes down to f/32 which is what I used. Maybe we'll try again with the focus set a little closer.
|
|
|
|
Andy Simmons
{K:7704} 4/10/2004
|
Amusing, rather erotic. It could be sharper, but I know DOF is difficult to control in mmacro shots.
|
|
0 
