|
Cheri Meredith-Evans
{K:1766} 3/28/2005
|
Thanks for your honest comment Dan! It is great to get feed back from such an excellent photographer. :) ~Cheri
|
|
|
Cheri Meredith-Evans
{K:1766} 3/28/2005
|
Lea, Thank you for your comment and for your excellent tips! ~Cheri :)
|
|
|
Cheri Meredith-Evans
{K:1766} 3/28/2005
|
Thank you so much for your helpful comment Dana! I had no idea about the teleconverter causing so much graininess! Had I known that I would've definently used a lower ISO film! Thanks for the tips, it's greatly appreciated! ~Cheri
|
|
|
Cheri Meredith-Evans
{K:1766} 3/28/2005
|
Thank you Khaled glad you like this one. :) ~Cheri
|
|
|
Khaled Mursi Hammoud
{K:54005} 3/23/2005
|
Another nice image of this wonderfully colored flower. Well done Cheri, Khaled.
|
|
|
Dana Finchum
{K:2200} 3/23/2005
|
Beautiful, like the composition and the colors. A tip, when you use a tele conv. on film and then scan it, the grain is always pronounced more so than with just the lens. The higher the iso the worse it gets. 800 iso resembles a bowl of m&m's when scanned. There are several programs out there that reduce this grain/noise. Neat Image is one of them and they have a trial version.
Dana
|
|
|
Lea Mulqueen
{K:7396} 3/23/2005
|
I have to agree with Dan. It just isn't sharp enough. Also, the dust and scratches need to be cleaned up in the background. I have that problem, too. No matter how hard I try to keep them clean dust always seems to land on my negs. If you have any version of PS, the clone tool will get rid of those marks in a hurry.
|
|
|
Dan Lightner
{K:12684} 3/23/2005
|
Colors look good together in this , but it needs better focus and more contrast.
Dan
|
|