|
|
|
allan basik
{K:434} 4/29/2005
|
Thanks Ian, i agree with you too it is too dark. i think the flatness comes from the lens and the circular polorizer and of course nature. the clouds were very regular that day and the sun directly over them like a back light.
thanks again
ab
|
|
|
|
|
allan basik
{K:434} 4/29/2005
|
Thanks Davide, i agree it's too dark but when i try to lighten it in PS the photo is ruined and not at all correct. i think the noon-day sun is the main element to over come. i plan to go back, maybe w/ a reflector. we'll see.
thanks again
ab
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 4/27/2005
|
for me the angel is dark also however it's really very good and wonder how you have givrn these clouds such a flattened feeling, that works with your angle to give this a very surreal quality.
One could attempt to fake this but for me the signs that say you didn't make it really appealing.
|
|
|
|
Davide Bressanello
{K:3103} 4/27/2005
|
Hi allan, for me, the statue are too dark, try to lighten it.
|
|
0 
