|
|
|
lavendu ...
{K:4882} 10/20/2005
|
thanks for your explanation, stefan. I agree to your critique. I tried to capture the subject a few times, but wasn't never satisfied. the shadow was either to weak, or the shining of the leaf was to strong.
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 10/19/2005
|
Two things make it appear hard as I see it: the reflected light on the leaf which creates a lot of contrast and the relatively hard light which casts pretty sharp shadows. Softer light would address both aspects. It is probably a very different image and just an alternative I thought could be interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
lavendu ...
{K:4882} 10/19/2005
|
I'm not sure if I understand the meaning of "softer rendition". less sharpness on the leaf or less contrast?
|
|
|
|
Paolo Corradini
{K:59552} 10/18/2005
|
bello il contrasto tra la luce e l'ombra..evocativo mi piace ciaooo
PAOLO
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 10/18/2005
|
Stefan's point interesting. I found my eye stupidly tracing the dof along that leaf.
|
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 10/18/2005
|
Lovely!
Jeanette
|
|
|
|
|
- -
{K:6282} 10/17/2005
|
Love this botanic universe w. its supernovas and starry specks! Fav! /H
|
|
|
|
|
jude .
{K:14625} 10/17/2005
|
Very nicely seen, Lavendu...nice change in rhythm.
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 10/17/2005
|
It is an interesting idea but I think I'd prefer a softer rendition.
|
|
0 
