Photograph By Orazio Minnella
Orazio M.
Photograph By Mitra Nademi-Nassari
Mitra N.
Photograph By Mohammad  Shirani
Mohammad  S.
Photograph By Salvadormarial Lozada
Salvadormarial L.
Photograph By Luciano Caturegli
Luciano C.
Photograph By Andre Denis
Andre D.
Photograph By Luigi Parisi
Luigi P.
Photograph By Art McCaffrey
Art M.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Photography Help Forum: 
  Q. People

Asked by Johnpaul Soto    (K=675) on 11/27/2004 
As an amateur photograpgher I enjoy new oppurtunities to improve on my techniques, while on a shoot I took pictures like the one below. Does any have an idea as to why the color white was so overexposed. I want to say it a couple of factors such as cheap lens, inaccurate white balance, no lens hood. I'm pretty upset with myself cause I really believe that the photos had a lot of potential. I'll keep on trying till I get this right but I would very much aprreciate any help you guys can offer.

Thanks,

J. Soto


    





 Chris Hayward   (K=1519) - Comment Date 11/27/2004
Johnpaul -
This looks like a difficult shot if you want the background and the white dress exposed.

What kind of film are you using (hopefully a low contrast film)?

I can't tell if the dress might be in full sun rather than the shade. The other thing I've noticed is that white dresses have so little contrast within the item, that if you really want details of the dress to show, it's almost essential to get some sort of soft directed light onto it (so there is some shadow detail). It's a hard shot to make but you might look at some of the catalog shots of models in white dresses to get some ideas.







 Chris Hayward   (K=1519) - Comment Date 11/27/2004
Oh - did you look at the negs to see if there is some detail there that could be printed by a custom lab?





 Brian E. Chilson   (K=-474) - Comment Date 11/30/2004
I looked at your other stuff and it seems your using Digital, which is very tricky when it comes to recording white just right. and as you've no doubt noticed, the detail is gone - never to return - if you over expose even by a little bit. It's very different from film where you typicaly want to expose a little bit more for detail in the white. - my suggestion is to treat it like ektachrome - shoot one right on - one a half stop under and one a half stop over and one of them should be correct.

I have to say - getting white not to blow out on me in digital is a constant frustration - you might check the settings on the camera and see if turning down the contrast setting doesn't help.


Brian





 Johnpaul Soto   (K=675) - Comment Date 11/30/2004
Hi Guys thank you for your insightful information, I will be appling this your info. in my next shoot hopefully this helps.

Best regards,

Johnpaul





 Adam E. J. Squier   (K=9803) - Comment Date 11/30/2004
If you're shooting digital, it most likely won't be able to keep all the tones. There are only a handful of cameras out there that will correctly expose a shot like this, and they're all made by Fuji. The S20, the S2, and the (as of yet not-released) S3.

All other digicams will blow out the dress like that or underexpose the background.




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.140625