| Photography Forum: Medium Format Photography Forum: |
 |
Q. Mamiya RB67pro not
 Asked by Casey McGonagle
(K=0) on 2/22/2005
|
Hello, I know someone who is selling this model with a 220 film back, a polaroid back and the 127mm lense for $300. I have some questions. MF is new to me other than my holga, so the more info the better.
1. Is this a good deal? 2. What is the difference between this model and the S model? 3. Is the difference a big deal? 4. Can I use more recent film backs with it? The guy says the 220 back is in kind of bad shape and I prefer a 120 back anyway
I guess that should cover it. If anyone has used this camera I would love to hear their impression.
Thanks everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 James McGinnis
(K=6045) - Comment Date 2/22/2005
|
I just got one and so far, I love it. It is a bit different from my Bronnys but I really like the feel and it seems much more solid of a camera.
http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/mamiyarb67.html
That link should get you to a site that can answer just about any question you have on the differences between the models.
For 300 bucks, if the camera looks and feels good, I'd say it's not a bad deal. Any chance you could have it looked at by a pro repair shop prior to purchasing?
|
|
|
|
 todd schoenbaum
(K=79) - Comment Date 5/31/2005
|
That is a good deal, but there are a few things worth mentioning.
- 220 backs are nearly worthless these days as there is little to no film being made in 220 anymore. - The Pro-S model is identical except that it has a few very handy "safety" features, so that you dont double expose or fire the shutter with the darkslide in place - my guess is that the 127mm lens is the non-"C" version, if so be aware that this is a single coated (as opposed to the multicoated "C" version), also it is likely that the shutter in the lens will need a tune up - my personal feeling is that the 127mm lens is a little long for a normal lens, I prefer the 90mm - I believe that more recent RB backs can be used, but you will not gain any of the safety features
check out the RB forum over at mamiya.com for all the answers that you could desire
|
|
|
|
 James McGinnis
(K=6045) - Comment Date 6/3/2005
|
I just bought a 120 Pro-S back for mine and it fits and works perfectly. I absolutely agree 100% regarding the 220 backs. That's alot of film to put in one back. Unless you've just got one heck of a project, I'd say go with the 120's.
|
|
|
|
 Scott Stillman
(K=30) - Comment Date 6/4/2005
|
I bought a PRO S about 3 weeks ago and so far I like it, but it is a commitment to a different way of shooting as there is no meter, and the camera is a tank ( I was familiar with 35mm and DSLR ) I like the safety features of the PRO S because I have already saved exposures because the camera won't let you make some mistakes. Medium Format is very exciting to me as I only shot 35mm for 30 years, I even started processing my own B&W again. I am going to do some comparison tests against my D1X to see how the 6x7 resolution looks with the same subject and lighting. I expect to be impressed. Definitely get a 120 back, I have a single 120 back plus the 120/220 power winder. I like the power winder when it works (9 out of 10 exposures). Everyone that sees the RB67 says "Wow!, what is that?"
|
|
|
|
 Christopher Yuchym
(K=101) - Comment Date 6/16/2005
|
Hello, I'm new to this site a came across this post in the forum about medium format. I have also just bought a Mamiya RB67 Pro S, 120 film back, 90mm Sekor C lens, and waist level finder for $900 (CDN). This Mamiya is in mint condition and has had only 10 rolls run through it, there is not one scratch on it, not even underneath. Now I have been shooting 35mm for over 13 years and just started the 6x7 format and have not shot with my Minolta Maxxum (Dynax)7 since. Medium format has made me slow down and think before just, point, autofocus and shoot. The Mamiya is a tank, but well worth it, when you get your slides back and put them on the light box you'll be blown away. I would sell my 35mm , but it makes for a great spot meter. I guess what I'm saying is "go for it, you wont regret it"
Christopher
|
|
|
|
|