|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/24/2006
|
So glad to hear that, my friend Giuseppe!
Ciao!
Nick
|
|
|
|
Giuseppe Guadagno
{K:34002} 4/24/2006
|
Right is the first interpretation. Right is also the second but without the "too mach".
Ciao Nick.
Giuseppe
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/23/2006
|
Giuseppe, my friend, if you meant that your taste could be a bit too poetical, I must say that I begin to realize that only the poetical souls have a chance to turn things to the better in this world of ours. The science alone didn't managed to do that, religion also not, and politics turns it worse day by day. I have the impression that art might do. Exactly those poetical souls that see what remains hidden otherwise.
On the other hand, if you meant that the photo itself is be a bit too poetical, well, that might as well be. It is almost impossible to stand there without getting poetical, you see.
My best wishes for you and thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
Giuseppe Guadagno
{K:34002} 4/20/2006
|
I've looked at this image again and conferm that for my taste, may be a bit "poetical", you have well choosen.
Ciao Nick.
Giuseppe
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/19/2006
|
¡Gracias tanto Alicia, sus comentarios son tan agradable!
¿En cuanto al granangular, puedo preguntar cuáles es la longitud focal de su lente?
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/19/2006
|
Great thanks, Giuseppe, for the great comment!
It is nice to see so many different views and ideas - this place has a *huge* creative potential.
I mean whenever I read the comments of you all guys here, I really have the appetite to get out and try that again!
So, Giuseppe, you see the background as a painted fuzzy picture, while Doyle would rather prefer the clear photographic version. And both of these ideas are wodnerful, since they approach one and the same scene from different sides.
Diversity is definitely not something that we miss here, and that's simply *great*!
Many thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/19/2006
|
Many many thanks for your ideas, Doyle, and just feel free to critique anything, since this is a very good way to learn. I welcome any such idea!
The two images were just the idea "let's do it the other way around", since I made also some photos like you describe here. I think the results are somehow similar in that they show a very nice place. But then again also different, since this one has rather its main subject at the foreground and the background is only supporting, while your idea is rather to let the sight escape to the deeper background, starting the blurred foreground.
Many many thanks for the detailed and nice comment!
Best regards,
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 4/19/2006
|
Thank you very much, Vahit!
Best wishes!
|
|
|
|
|
Alicia Popp
{K:87532} 4/19/2006
|
Uyyyyy! agua y flores!!!... bellas ambas, el rojo intenso...la perspectiva ...los reflejos en el agua. Estupenda imagen!
PD: Gracias por el consejo... no tengo gran angular, por el momento deberé esperar!
|
|
|
|
|
Giuseppe Guadagno
{K:34002} 4/18/2006
|
My favorite for, I am sorry to say it, not the flowers but the blurred background. The landscape is so sweet and serene and for the fuzziness look like waterpainted.
I like it.
Giuseppe
|
|
|
|
Doyle D. Chastain
{K:101119} 4/18/2006
|
You have a lovely, tranquil locale here. My criticism of this (beautiful) image is similar to the other. The verdant hills and lake in the distance, in my humble opinion, would make a much greater impact if they were the focus of the shot. Though blurred by DOF, the flowers would still be recognizable. In this way, you could also capture some of what MUST be very beautiful reflections as well. Again, this is my thought on how to make this a better capture . . . not really a critique on your shot. The composition is incredibly good with the lines drawing us in and the subject material is simply stunning . . . like a fairy tale land.
Regards,
Doyle I <-----
|
|
|
|
|
Vahit Emre Bilgenoglu
{K:226} 4/18/2006
|
Nice Swiss colors...
Congrats
|
|
0 
