|
|
Randee Armstrong
{K:-820} 5/17/2006
|
I LOVE the high contrast, this photo is fabulous, looks very edgy!!
|
|
|
|
Mohamed Hussien
{K:8371} 5/14/2006
|
Just excellent work you've done!
best wishes
|
|
|
|
Mark Orchard
{K:110} 5/14/2006
|
I agree, the burn looks too heavy on the screen. But not in print thankfully!
Regards.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Orchard
{K:110} 5/14/2006
|
Me too! PS makes life so easy... perhaps too easy? I remembered that I made the exp's at 400, and developed accordingly, but still it was less effort to make prints in PS than in a darkroom from the hi-cont negs.
Thanks for looking!
|
|
|
|
|
ooruc
{K:47} 5/14/2006
|
nice work for b&w. but is it burned more?
|
|
|
|
Leora Long
{K:11135} 5/14/2006
|
One of those happy accidents. The 400 film has such great latitude - I hate muddy negs from underexposing 100 speed film. You have to work so much harder in the darkroom.
Now I am addicted to PS.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Orchard
{K:110} 5/14/2006
|
Thanks! It was scanned from the neg, but accidentally exposed APX100 @ 400, hence the high-contrast.
Cheers, Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Leora Long
{K:11135} 5/14/2006
|
Wow. The F5. Interest effect on Agfa. Almost like an etching. Was it scanned from a print or neg?
Cheers, Leora
|
|
0 
