|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 6/15/2008
|
Thanks a lot for the nice comment and the suggestion, Gustavo!
A tele is the worst possible way in this situation. It is the choise that doesn't bring anything. What would we have with a tele? A washed out tiny part of the horizon, no big view of the background mountains, nothing at all. All the fuzzy contours of the mountains and the clouds would expand exactly according to the magnification scale, and this would only weaken the already weak contours, much like the attached image. This is exactly the reason why so many fantastic cloud formations are posted here as washed out diffuse shapes on the sky. The tele in this case is the choise when we are still totally inexperienced and get a hype by being able to have a telescopic view of something. But later on we see what the problem is.
Cheers!
Nick
|
Simulation of a tele under these conditions |
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 6/14/2008
|
Many thanks for the nice comment, Ilir!
Cheers!
Nick
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Karagiaouroglou
{K:127263} 6/14/2008
|
Many many thanks for the nice detailed comment, Dave! I guess I had much luck with the light on that day.
Nick
|
|
|
|
Gustavo Scheverin
{K:164501} 6/14/2008
|
ahhh, el horizonte detrás de la iglesia de ve de una gran belleza, mágico. Uno quiero verlo mejor. Yo habría tomado un buen teleobjetivo y habría buscado mas acercamiento sobre la iglesia.
Un abrazo!
|
|
|
|
Ilir Xhemsiti
{K:4285} 6/13/2008
|
Hi Nick,very good city shot,great composition,..
best regaeds ILIR
|
|
|
|
Dave Stacey
{K:150877} 6/12/2008
|
I like your composition with this one, Nick! The misty mountains make a good backdrop, and the angle of the trees and rooftops leading down to the church is very good.
Dave.
|
|
0 
