|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 2/18/2009
|
hehe Thanks Malules
|
|
|
|
Malules Fernandez
{K:54810} 2/17/2009
|
Very interesting and so creative, Roger.
i like it!
regards,
Malules
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 2/17/2009
|
Yeah and even if you scoop up what's left it won't be the same malleable film polaroid used to make, apparently they changed to a far more instant process (with way less lovely goo) which had old stock expired of that going fro a premium.
Wonder if someone would buy the patent at some stage.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 2/17/2009
|
hmmm check this
http://www.polaroid.com/ifilm/en/index.html it will be all over by spring 09
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 2/17/2009
|
you mean Polaroid?? I didn't know that
|
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 2/17/2009
|
ahh those were the days
they've completely stopped making any film now I read.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Skinner
{K:81846} 2/17/2009
|
yeah you simply squeeze the chemicals out of the sacks at the base of the print and squash it about until you are happy with the results then you let it set.. then I have cut the front of the print way from the dull browny grey background and so you can see the chemical residue on both the inside surfaces of the print and you can display them that way .. so what i am saying is the four triangles around the square are the external surface of the image and the browny square is the back surface of the image.. does that make sense, they are simply glued to the board after I covered it in graphite lines.. I meant to say too that I wet the board after I had drawn over it to smudge the lines
|
|
|
|
|
Ian McIntosh
{K:42997} 2/17/2009
|
is this one of those processes achieved while emulsion not set
sweet mandala either way
|
|
0 
