|
|
|
Nikolai Pozdniakov
{K:611} 12/16/2004
|
Nice shot. Is it really 560mm as Jimmy in the first comment said? I zoomed in all the way with 450mm and moon still looked pretty small.
|
|
|
|
|
Taras R. Hnatyshyn
{K:4055} 5/14/2004
|
Bob,
Good contrast and focus for a nearly full moon. Try to shoot the moon also near a quarter phase when the shadows give more contrast and depth to th eimage. Nice work.
Taras
|
|
|
|
|
Jonathan Manzano
{K:9} 5/14/2004
|
Great...
which the ISO?
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Sturgess
{K:49403} 5/14/2004
|
What a stunning shot, looks almost like a 'stone ball'
Margaret
|
|
|
|
Bob Jarman
{K:3145} 5/14/2004
|
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
John Loreaux
{K:86210} 5/14/2004
|
This is a great photo of the moon! I never tire of seeing it especially if its this well done! My best,JOHN
|
|
|
|
|
Tolis Elefantis
{K:3550} 5/14/2004
|
Congratulation! Excellent!
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel S. Garcia
{K:13946} 5/14/2004
|
Beautiful it is original it is as well as most planet images I see come from NASA and this did not. I can almost see the foot prints left behind by Armstrong! LOL Good work.
Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
Jimmy Payne
{K:21163} 5/14/2004
|
Hey Bob, original or not this is still a great moon shot. I'm surprised that you got it this good at 560mm. Makes me want a T-adapter so I can use my film cameras on telescope.
Very good moon photo.
Jimmy
|
|
0 
