|
|
|
Danny Brannigan
{K:19523} 9/21/2004
|
Kevin. Whilst yu are a master at Ps I am inclined to agree with Roger.On this one there is a white line around the building which is not rim lighting and the side of the shed opposite the sun is brightly lit whereas I think it should be in shadow. But at first glance it is a very pleant pic and i applaud you for trying to make it even better.
|
|
|
|
Miroslaw Banasiewicz
{K:947} 9/21/2004
|
great image...I like it :)
best regards
Miro
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 9/21/2004
|
Finally, FINALLY, after the umpteenth time, I get around to answering your question. I don't think that's what PS is FOR, but you demonstrate that it certainly CAN be used for this kind of thing, at a level of professionalism that always astonishes me. But was the program created for that? Pretty obviously not, I would say.
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn R. McGloughlin
{K:3716} 9/21/2004
|
Very nice
|
|
|
|
|
Lori Stitt
{K:75282} 9/21/2004
|
Very cool Kevin!
I like it,
Lori ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Ross
{K:6453} 9/21/2004
|
PS is a tool and you used it well. A great image.
|
|
|
|
Marcia .
{K:16108} 9/21/2004
|
Great colours, Kevin.
Regards, Márcia.
|
|
|
|
|
Terry Ward
{K:-926} 9/20/2004
|
Yes indeed that's what PS is for. And you used it to extremes. Very nice work. T
|
|
0 
