|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 12/3/2004
|
Yes, Richard. Actually it won't stand up to enlargement much beyond the size it is here on the screen. I'm telling myself "It's good enough for Usefilm" which feels pretty funny. But you know what I mean. I think I'll take my 135mm/F3.5 Canon tele on the T101 for a crisper, more detailed view. But I've only seen that mist on ONE morning in the last two months... And I wouldn't have any record of it if I hadn't had my mobile phone with me! I'm getting VERY fond of it!!
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Thornton
{K:26442} 11/29/2004
|
Your compositional elements are all in place, making the image look pretty good to me. But a regular camera would probably have lent more details to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 11/29/2004
|
Aha! another comment from someone whose opinion I value. Thanks, Keith. The mist on the distant river did attract my eye, and I'm quite pleased with the result. Your suggestion about trimming off some of the RHS is well taken. My tendency to panorama-ise (is that a word?) everything betrayed me here.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Naylor
{K:13064} 11/28/2004
|
Hi Roger,
well the 'toy' did good here. Actually I think the photographers eye was the reason it turned out so well.
The power lines actually work well in the image (which is unusual). I'd maybe just crop a little of the right, to bring the pylon onto the third.
However, the atmosphere really carries the whole image. Excellent work (or should this be 'play'?)
K
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Williams
{K:86139} 11/28/2004
|
Thank you very much, Craig. I really like this one, despite ots limitations, and am glad that at least ONE person has noticed it and commented.
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Hanson
{K:7836} 11/28/2004
|
Very artistic for a toy camera Roger! I think with photography, conveying emotion is more important than technical perfection anyway, so just keep doing it with feeling and we'll forgive the noise!
|
|
0 
