|
|
Bruce W. Clark
{K:1100} 3/6/2005
|
Thanks for the input. I'm posting three photos today that I prepared for posting differently than I have in the past. I would be glad to hear from you on them.
|
|
|
|
|
Roberto Okamura
{K:22851} 3/5/2005
|
Yes Bruce 360k and/or 800 pixels in larger side.
I see the stats from your pics and you are using 400 dpi... It?s a high quality for paper impression.. For video/internet 72 dpi is enough.. This way you can resize your pics to 800 pixels without loose internet image quality..
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce W. Clark
{K:1100} 2/27/2005
|
In don't mind your commends. What you see in my portfolio is two years of teaching myself macro. I'll be branching out as soon as I have everything figured out. As to size, I thought that we were restricted to a maximum size of 360kb.
|
|
|
|
|
Roberto Okamura
{K:22851} 2/22/2005
|
Bruce! I was seeing your beautiful portfolio and choosed this pic to comment. I think it is a very good composition. In general i think you have a very conservartive compositon, you can try another angles, framing and a bigger image near from 800 pixel to allow us to see more details from you shot.
I hope you don?t mind for this feedback.
Best regards!
Roberto.
|
|
|
|
|
Bryan Jarmain
{K:11941} 1/24/2005
|
Very nicely composed and exposed. A nice subject as well. Could be nice if the background (bohek) was less in focus and simpler. Thanks for sharing.
Bryan
|
|
|
|
Peter Daniel
{K:33866} 1/24/2005
|
Wonderful Photograph Bruce, Great colors, clarity and Composition.
Thanks for sharing?
Peter Daniel
|
|
0 
