|
Alyazia Khaleefa
{K:1168} 3/1/2005
|
... Curtis, i'm going to keep up my promise of the What & How.. check my first shot ever and give me ur comment ;)
|
|
|
Alyazia Khaleefa
{K:1168} 3/1/2005
|
aaah!!!! what a great surpriZzZe!! ok!!! i'll upload a special SuRpRiZe for u!! ;) check my first shot ever!!
|
|
|
pureen ~
{K:37} 3/1/2005
|
urrrm, do i know u by any chance ?!!! that's a great shot sweety :)
|
|
|
Curtis Feather
{K:5130} 2/21/2005
|
glad we finally more or less have understanding. but don't let it be something you think about too much, don't make photography too much of a process, go with the feeling and later analyze it. good luck .
|
|
|
Alyazia Khaleefa
{K:1168} 2/21/2005
|
guess i've got ur point... now... i wont post any photograph till i get a unique and a creative "what" & "how"! this is a promise!! =)
--------------------------------------------
"What a man really wants is creative challenge with sufficient skills to bring him within the reach of success so that he may have the expanding joy of achievement."
this is a creative challenge to me ;) i can do it!
thanks Curtis
|
|
|
Curtis Feather
{K:5130} 2/20/2005
|
sorry if i didn't make it clear. basically when I look at this, at first I see a nice composition, but very quickly my mind wants to rearrange it and figure it out. because the objects remain more or less recognizable and are not abstracted beyond their normal form, it is easy for the mind to quickly see the turn of the camera and then all you have focussed on is the process, the technique used, or the 'how'. if we didn't have to focus on this, we could rather just look and appreciate the 'what', the 'what' has been accomplished, the form, the composition, the elements, all these aspects. but because to me it is a quite recognizable technique, the mind focusses on this and the analytical side, rather than just viewing the piece as a whole and appreciating it for what it is. hopefully that makes a little more sense, either way, i'm not trying to down your work, it's a nice step in a direction you should go with, just for me it shows and represents a technique too much.
|
|
|
Mohammad Hamdan
{K:351} 2/20/2005
|
You have a very unique way in choosing the angle of view
|
|
|
Alyazia Khaleefa
{K:1168} 2/20/2005
|
:$ i didn't get ur point of the "how"&"what"!! can u explain it? =)
|
|
|
Curtis Feather
{K:5130} 2/20/2005
|
I like seeing different approaches and perspectives, here though I find it a little too 'techiniquey', a turn of the camera and there it is. The composition is interesting, but because the objects remain quite intact and inframe, we can identify with them and the mind quickly realizes 'how' this has been accomplished, rather than looking at 'what' has been accomplished.
|
|