|
|
|
Tyler Robbins
{K:904} 4/25/2005
|
Good lord this has been a bitch to print. the scan looks great but the actual negative is pretty tricky to work with. I have been doing it on grade 3 fb, and burning in the sky a bazillion times to get all the trees in. I am getting really tired of 35mm negs. I thinks it's time to get myself a medium format slr or better yet a 4x5. I know a bigger neg isn't the answer to the sky being washed out when I print, but I think it might help. I am determined to get at least 6 good prints of this, I have a galler space lined up for next month. Time to show some work.
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Suaverdez
{K:1001} 4/3/2005
|
Great angle and very atmospheric.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Beltran
{K:32612} 4/2/2005
|
The composition is just right. Nice range of tones without having the sky getting blown out. It must have been a beautiful house in its prime. Who knows how many families have been raised there. It's very sad. Even in its decay, it's like a beautiful person. Graceful.
|
|
|
|
Jon O'Brien
{K:11321} 4/2/2005
|
I like the low POV, the framing (with the tree on the left following the contours of the building) and the toning, but think this would be a more striking image (perhaps because it would have a more "historical" feel to it) if you had gone for greater sharpness and higher contrasts. Now of course if what you've got is what you were looking for, well then you have succeeded admirably!
Cheers,
Jon
(PS: capitalism abhors competition; big operators will always tend to absorb or destroy small ones regardless of the industry.)
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Lloyd
{K:9943} 4/2/2005
|
yeah sad its going to waste now wonder how it got damaged nice capture any way . keep us updated
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Ross
{K:6453} 4/2/2005
|
Excellent vision, misty and moody. Nice work.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Wagner
{K:5896} 4/2/2005
|
Very old and sad, great way of presenting this!
Michael
|
|
0 
