|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 5/10/2005
|
Dear Maurizio - first, no need to apologize for a seemingly critical comment, I welcome that and in fact try to encourage it :-) For this flower, the exposure is actually quite good (I metered the incident light in this case). The choice of tones is a tribute to a friend of mine who uses this range of grays very effectively. It is not what I choose normally for my own work, but in this case I thought it would enhance the subtle textures of the petals.
|
|
|
|
Maurizio Spadaccino
{K:5132} 5/10/2005
|
the details in the flowers are really great here, it makes it a pleasant view. Just my very poor opinion, and please take it like that...: did you think about giving a stop more exposure in order to give the flower more brightness? I'm just curious to read what you think...
Thanks from now
Maurizio
|
|
|
|
|
Tiro Leander
{K:19060} 5/7/2005
|
I like that you have included the dark area in the bottom, it makes a fine composition
|
|
|
|
Linda Imagefree
{K:72276} 5/7/2005
|
Stefan this is very nice, I like the minimal depth of field, and the diagonal composition, the focus is very clear, I think you can get away with all of that black in the background, without a tighter crop, because there's nothing to focus on and the eye is continually led back to the flower. Good job of focusing the attention on the flower. Linda
|
|
|
|
|
Omar Rifaat
{K:10141} 5/6/2005
|
Beautiful composition! Lovely in B&W. looks timeless..
|
|
|
|
Jeanette Hägglund
{K:59855} 5/6/2005
|
I agree - very sweet! :)
Jeanette
|
|
|
|
|
michelle k.
{K:16270} 5/6/2005
|
sweet, beautiful
|
|
0 
