|
|
|
Salvatore Rossignolo
{K:13559} 6/13/2005
|
Wow! Great shot! You and I think alike when the shot opened up I thought of 7 then I rolled down to the title and voila! 7...7/7
Sal
|
|
|
|
Robert Delgadillo
{K:3509} 5/27/2005
|
Thank you for getting it Rafi, certainly I could have lightened the dark side but that would have negated the whole effect of the old/new and "7" creation by the converging shadows. In this case it was the overall effect that is interesting. We all have taken shots that were overexposed or underexposed in diffent parts of an image so we usually don't use that image. But here the over/under becomes the image. Otherwise it's just another boring tourist shot.
Robert is my given name and my written signature but I have always been Bob for everything else, thank you for being so respectful.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Dr. Rafael Springmann
{K:89517} 5/27/2005
|
You sign your comment with Bob, so with your pemission I'll use that name henceforth.
I like the way you partitioned your photo into a dark and a bright area, both of which are clearly visible and forming, as you intended, the figure 7.
Thank you, Bob, for your very kind comment on my "Memories from Paris 7."
Best regards,
Rafi
|
|
|
|
Hanggan Situmorang
{K:37833} 5/27/2005
|
Great angle and composition, Robert. I like the shape of the shadows, here. Perhaps lighten the dark area won't distract the overall picture...
|
|
|
|
|
brandy bailey
{K:3509} 5/27/2005
|
interesting lighting. nice street scene and captured well.
|
|
|
|
Larry Fosse
{K:66493} 5/27/2005
|
Hey Bob...I'm gunna be there Saturday on vacation...I'll have to check it out...excellent cityscape
|
|
|
|
Gregory McLemore
{K:35129} 5/26/2005
|
I agree, its a 7.
|
|
|
|
|
Mary Brown
{K:71879} 5/26/2005
|
The diagonal is neat. With the light you had to work with, I guess it would be dificult to get a little more brightness in the right side part to show a more detail there. However, the diagonal of light definately distinguishes old from new.
Mary
|
|
0 
