|
|
Nicole Marcisz
{K:10268} 9/12/2005
|
well I think you did a good job. Keep posting and doing more to get better.
cheers,
nicole
|
|
|
|
|
Shelley Pierce
{K:388} 9/1/2005
|
this is a mega great shot...well i no nothing about photography but u guys r all so cute together. by the way u r so gonna go bald wen u get old.
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua Rainey
{K:5069} 8/31/2005
|
Paul,
Thanks for the comment good buddy. I shot this panorama at 18mm (28 equiv). I think that is why the distortion occured. I've been expirementing with stuff and I found that distance is crucial to shots like this, cuz if you're too close then there is more distortion and things don't line up like they should. Thanks for the comment...
Josh
|
|
|
|
|
michelle k.
{K:16270} 8/31/2005
|
AWESOME!!!
|
|
|
|
Paul Lara
{K:88111} 8/30/2005
|
One thing to consider is that the closer you get to 55mm (90mm equivalent) the less distortion you have to deal with at the edges. At 90mm, vertical lines will remain vertical, without bowing out.
If that is not possible, then make sure you use a tripod, and lock the tilt so you can only pan.
|
|
|
|
Timothy Yap
{K:997} 8/30/2005
|
#1 Use a tripod that is level, the mum on the RHS is on an odd angle and I suspect the dad (the middle shot) is sloping to the right.
#2 Light sources are important, the lamps are too hot - find alternative light sources to eliminate this problem.
#3 Use manual settings on your camera to avoid problems with autofocus and light (I think you have done this already)
#4 Experiment and practice. This shot is better than the 270 deg front of house, simply because it is more interesting, subject matter is important.
PS I love your creek and skating shots :)
|
|
0 
