|
Carlos Pérez
{K:699} 1/28/2005
|
I rate this image a six because there is, as you have said, something missing. Perhaps you should have shot her whole body (the shot feels too close to the subject), maybe with her face hidden by her hair to maintain that annonymous feeling. Also, there might be too much empty space to the left, in contrast with the wealth of detail the model's body exhibits (the beautiful, sexy moles, the pierced nipples, the curves of her body and, most importantly, the pink panties) due to the closeness of the shot.
I think you tried to put the model as the central element, but the crop distracts from this purpose. This is an old shot of yours, so you've probably improved since then (I haven't looked at your other pictures) but your words on the scarce commenting of nude photos made me feel guilty :P, considering how much I liked this picture.
|
|
|
Rodulf Gomez
{K:1243} 9/1/2004
|
I love the angle and composition. Nice touch with the pink panties. Nicely done John. Regards -ray
|
|
|
Phil M
{K:11526} 3/29/2004
|
John, I think it's a sad fact of usefilm and any other site like it that any nude image is going to get a huge number of views and comparitively few comments - I think one comment in every 24 would be pretty good going!
|
|
|
Andreas Wolkerstorfer
{K:5090} 3/25/2004
|
http://www.usefilm.com/image/160368.html was a bit better
|
|
|
John Masters
{K:71} 3/25/2004
|
1 comment after 24 views? I am a little disappointed to be honest!
I know it's not the best shot ever, but that's the whole point of this site is it not? I hope usefilm is not becoming "eliteist" and therefore not giving us newbies the constructive crit that we all so crave!
If 10 of your friends tell you that your pictures are good then perhaps they are just being nice, the point of putting myself in the public eye like this is so that total strangers will give me honest comments.
Or do people prefer to say nothing rather than be harsh about someones work?
C'mon people! Tear me to pieces here!
|
|
|
john amore
{K:14015} 3/25/2004
|
John great job composition and color great good work John
|
|