|
|
Critique By:
JL E (K:9693)
10/1/2003 12:44:10 PM
excellent perspective! good eyes...
cheers
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Jennifer Nail (K:451)
2/3/2003 1:52:02 PM
I have regular goldfish. You did a good job capturing him... mine are too fast for me!
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Afzal H Mohamed (K:909)
2/1/2003 2:32:15 PM
Hey get this over with willya...i'm tired of posing..! He looks like a real character alright..apt name too!
nice capture!
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Alan Sislen (K:649)
1/25/2003 5:51:41 AM
James, very nice composition. I especially like the contrasting textures. I agree with the "softness" comment that could have been the result of the floating dock, being handheld, or the f/stop.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Jim Gamble (K:12164)
1/24/2003 9:31:31 PM
James, its a good shot but it appears that the upper part of the cleat is a bit soft, try using a bit more DOF next time.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
James Crawford (K:794)
1/20/2003 8:47:11 PM
Thanks Andy. I don't see the greencast, but it definitely is not as sharp as the original print. Something to do with sizing it down....can't figure it out.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Andy Eulass (K:13435)
1/20/2003 8:27:37 PM
Very nice composition. I like how the surf leads my eye across the image. The colors seem nice but there does seem to be a slight green cast, but that may just be my monitor. I do wish it had been a little sharper, however.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Mark Scheuern (K:1428)
1/13/2003 8:15:05 AM
I wish I could see a bit more detail in the white fur on Oreo's head but that's a small nit. I like it. Nice friend and pet, too.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Molly Walters (K:1284)
1/8/2003 11:26:04 AM
I think you acheived your objective in that the fore ground is more silliouetted, you may want to try a different crop,with a smaller amount of fore grond, I think right now it is a lttle distracting to have that much fore ground.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
James Crawford (K:794)
1/7/2003 10:57:49 PM
Larry, believe me I plan on that! Just have 3 more old ones and the new ones begin. Actually I have one new one up already titled "oreo".
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Larry Edwards (K:843)
1/7/2003 6:45:25 PM
Since I live in San Diego, I noticed that the skyline here doesn't have a number of familiar buildings. Then I saw that you took this more than 10 years ago. Likewise with all your other images posted here so far. So, my constructive comment is: post what you're shooting now!
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
John Black (K:1047)
1/7/2003 6:34:07 PM
Neat composition here but here is what I read from the shot. From the positioning of the guy on the cross and the direction he is pointing, if the cross is on the left of the picture he has his back turned. If the cross is on the right, then I get the Watching over feeling. Just food for thought.
JB
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Lisa Howeler (K:3706)
1/7/2003 6:11:19 PM
Don't know what I like -- I just do. Very interesting photo. I like the background and the statue off to the side.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Raymond Bliss (K:3182)
1/6/2003 2:26:22 PM
A polarizing filter would definitely have helped. Also, instead of aligning the right side of the building with the edge of the picture (leaving the left side severely tilted) I would have split the difference, or, if you are good in photoshop, correct the distortion altogether with the "perspective" tool. Still, this is a good image, and I'm old enough to remember the original album cover........
Ray
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Martin Krievs (K:195)
1/6/2003 9:34:09 AM
Of course the reference should be to physical graffiti - looks like quite an oppressive building.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Sue O'S (K:12878)
1/6/2003 9:20:30 AM
Welcome to Usefilm, Mr. Crawford! Glad you became a member. Do you prefer Jim or James?
I agree with you that the depth of field is really nice, but I agree with AJ that it's over-exposed and in need of a polarizer in front of the lens. The blown out areas detract rather than help. I think this image needs a different time of the day or a different type of weather - overcast clouds, for example. You have a fast shutter speed because you caught the moving water beautifully, but it still ended up washed out. Perhaps a neutral density filter would help you get an extra stop. I see the date of 1992; I'm guessing you can't go back to try another day?
Keep shooting! Looking forward to seeing more from you.
Regards,
Sue
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
AJ Haselwood (K:2148)
1/6/2003 8:39:01 AM
A polarizing filter would help this image look less blown out. It would bring out some more detail.
aj
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Michael J. Noonan (K:-17)
1/6/2003 8:34:14 AM
Houses of the Holy, all you need now is Robert Plant in drag looking through one of the windows.
-mn
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
James Crawford (K:794)
1/6/2003 8:17:41 AM
Thanks Jennifer! He's such a ham!
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Jennifer Littler (K:32)
1/6/2003 4:38:51 AM
I don't know what it is about this photo that i like, It's Fantastic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Andre Cajot (K:7793)
1/6/2003 1:44:31 AM
Sport is Jai-Alai. Looks like french "pelote basque".
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
James Crawford (K:794)
1/5/2003 6:39:26 PM
Thanks for the comment. I can see the blur, but what does "flat" mean?
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
|
Critique By:
Daniel Jarrett (K:612)
1/5/2003 6:36:36 PM
nice...its a little blurry and flat.
|
| Photo By: James Crawford
(K:794)
|
|
