Photograph By Mumen Khatib
Mumen K.
Photograph By Alex Avilov
Alex A.
Photograph By Robert Levy
Robert L.
Photograph By Nanda Baba das
Nanda B.
Photograph By Rob Roy
Rob R.
Photograph By Danny Provost
Danny P.
Photograph By Jan Symank
Jan S.
Photograph By Nick Lagos
Nick L.
 
imageopolis Home Sign Up Now! | Log In | Help  

Your photo sharing community!

Your Photo Art Is Not Just A Fleeting Moment In Social Media
imageopolis is dedicated to the art and craft of photography!

Upload
your photos.  Award recipients are chosen daily.


Editors Choice Award  Staff Choice Award  Featured Photo Award   Featured Critique Award  Featured Donor Award  Best in Project Award  Featured Photographer Award  Photojournalism Award

Imageopolis Photo Gallery Store
Click above to buy imageopolis
art for your home or office
.
 
  Find a Photographer. Enter name here.
    
Share On
Follow Us on facebook 

 



  Photography Forum: Camera Equipment News Forum: 
  Q. CANON JUST ANNOUNCED 300D 'DIGITAL REBEL'...

Asked by Anthony Gargani    (K=4527) on 8/19/2003 
Official release from Canon...

300D-Digital Rebel camera coming out soon.

6.5mp sensor (the one from the 10D-6.3 effective pixels).

more at: http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/eosdigital/index.html

Package rumored to include 18-55 f3.5-5.6 Dedicated lens, may be 'proprietary' to this body, not sure.

Price is said to be appx 70% of the 10D.


    



 Anthony Gargani   (K=4527) - Comment Date 8/19/2003
more lens info...

Compatible lenses Canon EF lenses (including EF-S lens)
(35mm-equivalent focal length is equal to approx.1.6 times the marked focal length.)
Lens mount Canon EF mount

(specs from the page linked above)





 Anthony Gargani   (K=4527) - Comment Date 8/19/2003
Sony? Sony who? ;P

just a bit o' wee early morning humor....





 Chris Lauritzen   (K=14949) - Comment Date 8/20/2003
Very nice, hopfully Nikon will follow suit.





 . .   (K=2743) - Comment Date 8/20/2003
1000$ for 6MP d-slr + consumer quality 18-55 lens, not bad

full frame chip, consumer level dslr may be more than an year away..





 David Goldfarb   (K=7611) - Comment Date 8/20/2003
Seems like the issue with the lens is that they've designed it so that there is more room in the mirror box or with a pellicle mirror, and therefore the rear element can get closer to the film, making it easier to design a short lens for this smaller format.





 . .   (K=2743) - Comment Date 8/20/2003
http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20030820_digitalrebel.html

$999 for body+lens..
so the street price will be 800$? so even with a couple of additional good lenses like like 50/1.4 and 100/2.8 macro.., it will be a very affordable kit





 Raymond Bliss   (K=3182) - Comment Date 8/20/2003
Well, looks like we win again. Even if you aren't a Canon user. The ripple effect should be interesting to watch over the next 3 to 6 months. Prices on all digital SLR's aimed at the consumer market should come down quite a bit. Even the price in the 10D may keep going down. From what I have read so far, the Rebel D will be a capable camera (but it still doesn't have a PC socket for studio lights) and I'm also going to be watching the New Pentax *Ist D. This is going to be fun .





 David Goldfarb   (K=7611) - Comment Date 8/20/2003
If it has a hot shoe or at least a connection for a hot shoe adapter, then a Wein Safe-Sync HS should let you connect studio lights.

I'm interested. About the only thing I use 35mm for any more is bird photography, and I have the rare Canon FD-EOS converter to use my long teles with a digital body and just picked up the similarly rare Tamron Adaptall EOS mount, giving me a total of seven lenses I could use right away from 90mm to 600mm as long as there are no compatibility problems. Since I'm accustomed to manual exposure and manual focus, the body just needs to be a light-tight box with a sensor. I suppose I would miss spot metering, but histogram display would make up for it. Birds are pretty film consumptive, so I can easily imagine balancing the costs of film and processing over the life of the camera body.





 Raymond Bliss   (K=3182) - Comment Date 8/21/2003
David, that's always been one of my pet peeves. I hate having to attach a pc cord to a hotshoe adapter and have the cord hanging down over the front of the camera. I know that's just personal taste, but the inclusion of a pc socket is hardly new technology and wouldn't make that much difference in manufacturing steps or price. And to really make good use of any camera in a studion setting, you need that ability to hook up off camera flash. So, when all the hoopla dies down, I'm going to be looking for a good comparison between the 300D and the Pentax *Ist D. If image quality is reasonably the same, I will probably go with the Pentax. I expect the price on the Pentax to drop quickly to compete directly with the Canon.





 David Goldfarb   (K=7611) - Comment Date 8/21/2003
Fair enough, though if you don't like cables you might look into radio slaves. It's around $350 to set up a Pocket Wizard system, but they do clear up a lot of clutter in the studio, and I've only heard good things about them.




Log in to post a response to this question

 

 

Return To Photography Forum Index
|  FAQ  |  Terms of Service  |  Donate  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise  |

Copyright ©2013 Absolute Internet, Inc - All Rights Reserved

Elapsed Time:: 0.171875