|
|
Michael Kanemoto
{K:22115} 10/10/2006
|
I like what you did - here is the addition of glow in Picasa to fuzz it up a bit.
|
How romantic! |
|
|
|
|
Michael Kanemoto
{K:22115} 10/10/2006
|
Yellow filter applied - gives a nice pop.
|
|
|
|
|
narabia
{K:9563} 10/9/2006
|
yes, better :)
I just bought a 150mm Sigma 2.8
So sharp and quiet, focusing from 38cm/15in!!!
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3283&navigator=5
and sometimes with a borrowed 105mm Nikkor-DC 2.0 and Nikon 50mm 1.4 (both for portraits and also flowers)
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Kanemoto
{K:22115} 10/9/2006
|
I think you have something there.
It's better, but still lacks that glow you have in your shots. Are you using a 105 mm Sigma macro lens? There's some great Bokeh.
|
better? |
|
|
|
|
narabia
{K:9563} 10/9/2006
|
ops, wrong crop file added above
|
|
|
|
|
|
narabia
{K:9563} 10/9/2006
|
I forgot to add that it wasnt impossible with the main image.. too bright light on petals.
Of course we could crop Option 2 image.
|
|
|
|
|
|
narabia
{K:9563} 10/9/2006
|
IMHO you decided on the worst image of those three.
Petals are overexposed. The best is Option 2.
I add the image converted in my newly invented way ;)
Details on petals are nicely visible and DOF is still nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jenni Alasuutari
{K:2120} 10/9/2006
|
A nice idea! A little rainbow! :)
|
|
|
|
The Pilgrim
{K:65007} 10/9/2006
|
Nice backlight image!
Wonderful colors and strong composition!
Well done!
Congrats
Paul E Brumit
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Kanemoto
{K:22115} 10/9/2006
|
A third to choose from - middle amount of DOF with background flowers.
|
Option 3 |
|
|
|
|
Michael Kanemoto
{K:22115} 10/9/2006
|
More DOF shows off the two flowers symettrically arranged behind the main flower.
|
Option 2 |
|
0 
