|
|
|
John Hatziemmanouil
{K:40580} 12/7/2003
|
For my taste this is more interesting because of the nice '''pose''' that did the chameleon. Also the lighting is better and support the texture of its body.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Stenquist
{K:182} 12/6/2003
|
An interesting photograph. I like the deep contrast of subject and background.
|
|
|
|
|
B:)liana
{K:30945} 11/19/2003
|
great capture !
|
|
|
|
Gabriella Carta
{K:22879} 11/18/2003
|
wonderful shot, great!!
|
|
|
|
|
Konstantinos Tsagarakis
{K:669} 11/18/2003
|
Kosta you're right! I hadn't noticed the warning about the pictures more than 640px...
|
|
|
|
|
jeff hagerman
{K:73} 11/18/2003
|
i like this composition more than your previous post. it seems to have better balance. what are you using for a light source? if you added a fill light from behind I think the subject would standout from the background better adding to the depth of the photo. great picture.
cheers
jeff
|
|
|
|
Kostas Tzanetos
{K:22012} 11/18/2003
|
I like this image much more than the other one! It seems more like a drawing,or a cartoon to me than a real chameleon.And I find it very funny :-)
The sharpness issue is a painful one,and I think the best you can do is to have your negatives professionaly scanned and then work on them. As for usefilm,I haven't noticed a degradation of the original image,unless of course it's bigger than 640px.
be happy my friend ;-)
Kostas
|
|
0 
