|
|
naftali raz
{K:1819} 2/25/2005
|
a nice catch from your garden. a real etching effect.
but the red frame doesn't work for me... less is more?
thanks for you comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Bryan Jarmain
{K:11941} 1/30/2005
|
An amazing abstract photo and an excellent idea. I like the photo as it is. I don't know if the red boarder does justice to the photo itself.
|
|
|
|
Markus Scholz
{K:23722} 1/30/2005
|
Thanks for your comment, Christian. You can see the long way I still have to go in my learning process. With this pic I played a bit around with PS, but didn't find any satisfactory effect. Therefore I left it as it was, just showing the beautiful structure of the ice flowers and added the frame to take care of the contrast.
Regards, Markus
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Barrette
{K:21125} 1/29/2005
|
Very nice study. I agree that amplifying the contrast will result in a more powerful effect, emphazising the abstraction. I would go also for a B&W rendition, frame included.
|
|
|
|
|
Markus Scholz
{K:23722} 1/28/2005
|
Thanks for your kind comment, Curtis, which means quite a lot from a professional like you. As I said, there was no postprocessing at all, just a plain window full of ice flowers. But I will play around a bit with PS and see what comes out. Welcome to usefilm, btw.
Regards, Markus
|
|
|
|
|
Curtis Feather
{K:5130} 1/28/2005
|
This photo has a very print like feel to it. Interesting technique/results. For me it lacks a little contrast in values from a distance, but up close there are great details in the ice. Maybe pulling out some highlights and shading in some other areas would make it more interesting.
|
|
|
|
ISMAEL MARCOS
{K:10535} 1/28/2005
|
NICE TOO BUT I PREFER THE OTHER.
MUST BE A QUESTION OF TEXTURES...
REGARDS.
ISML.
|
|
0 
