|
|
|
Val .
{K:4973} 11/26/2003
|
good!
|
|
|
|
|
lisa .
{K:9370} 11/19/2003
|
just remebered this pic and came back to see it again, laughed at your reply..........very funny..........and yes, my walls are comfertable, ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Lopez-Calvete
{K:2441} 10/21/2003
|
Two equally obtuse comments from the cutest/wierdest women on Usefilm! ;-)
Yeah, the walls, I think the one in shot has a microscopic texture to it that is ruining the whole minimalist thing, I must get my interior designer back to sort that out LOL!
The other room has exactly what you would expect in a poncy freezing cold house.......hideously expensive glass table and a stylish but otherwise useless light fitting!
Just because both of you can't see your walls for the padding!
|
|
|
|
|
t m
{K:105} 10/21/2003
|
the walls are too fussy for me
|
|
|
|
|
lisa .
{K:9370} 10/21/2003
|
minimalist.........a posh word for i cant afford to furnish right now...........hehehe, jus kiddin cool shot.......@richard..whats in the other room?........more white walls and dark floors silly., jus kiddin, like it very much
|
|
|
|
|
Terry McCully
{K:9221} 10/21/2003
|
Nice selective focus here Andrew.. well done... turn up the heat ! ! !
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Marriner
{K:6657} 10/21/2003
|
I like the tilted angle and the suggestion of "what's in the other room" implicit in the dimly lit sofa viewed through the doorway. I guess having the camera point outw towards the observer would make it look too much like a Leica advertisement.
No wonder it's cold - large spaces and I can't see any radiators. It was 27C here today...
Haven't they linked a fondness for Corbusier to a recessive gene...? ;-)
|
|
0 
