|
|
zosia zija
{K:11106} 9/13/2004
|
nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
Tiro Leander
{K:19060} 8/16/2004
|
A fine series you've made here, i like the toning and the atmosphere. This one is the one i like the most.. great DOF here.
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 8/16/2004
|
Hugo - as always, thank you for your comperhensive assessment :-)
|
|
|
|
Hugo de Wolf
{K:185110} 8/14/2004
|
Hmmm. Although it uses the diagonal setup of the first and the setup of the second, I think this photo stands out a bit, as the DOF is a tad too shallow. The softness in the branche's top right corner doesn't quite fit within this series, I think. Of the three, it's the least intriguing and least challenging shot to look at. A nice one, but especially in comparison with the first of this triptych, it fades a bit into the background.
Cheers,
Hugo
|
|
|
|
|
Stefan Engström
{K:24473} 8/13/2004
|
Thanks Tom, I do know what you mean. Either more (Kim) or less (you) DOF on the vanishing part of the branch is what is needed here. It is a little wishy-washy as it is presented here...
|
|
|
|
tom rumland
{K:14874} 8/13/2004
|
stefan, simple and straightforward. just the way i like it ;^) simple lines intertwining... however, i feel the compostion could be improved had you increased the focal angle to te branch. i'm not sure if that's even a term, nevermind a proper one. what i mean is a less perpendicular angle to the branch showing a bit more distance to exagerate the dof effect. i think i'm babbling so i'll leave it at that ;^)
take care,
tom
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Culbert
{K:37070} 8/13/2004
|
Great lines in this one, with the twisting bark and the diagonal line through the bg. I wish there was a little more DOF to have the entire log in focus with the background still out of focus.
Well seen with the curving bark... really adds that extra element!
|
|
0 
